Evidence mapPaperPMID 40097409Full record

ReviewBone research2025

Bone-brain interaction: mechanisms and potential intervention strategies of biomaterials.

Jiaze Yu, Luli Ji, Yongxian Liu, Xiaogang Wang, Jing Wang, Changsheng Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bone research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Alzheimer's Disease Risk Factor APOE4 Exerts Dimorphic Effects on Female Bone.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  5. [Gut-brain-joint axis in rheumatoid arthritis: from microeco-logical disturbance to multi-target synergy].Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Editorial: Application of stem cells in degenerative orthopedic diseases.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jiaze YuThe State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200237, PR China.
Luli JiThe State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200237, PR China.
Yongxian LiuThe State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200237, PR China.
Xiaogang WangThe State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200237, PR China. wangxiaogang@ecust.edu.cn.
Jing WangThe State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200237, PR China. biomatwj@163.com.
Changsheng LiuThe State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200237, PR China. liucs@ecust.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0509-7334

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) T2288102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following the discovery of bone as an endocrine organ with systemic influence, bone-brain interaction has emerged as a research hotspot, unveiling complex bidirectional communication between bone and brain. Studies indicate that bone and brain can influence each other's homeostasis via multiple pathways, yet there is a dearth of systematic reviews in this area. This review comprehensively examines interactions across three key areas: the influence of bone-derived factors on brain function, the effects of brain-related diseases or injuries (BRDI) on bone health, and the concept of skeletal interoception. Additionally, the review discusses innovative approaches in biomaterial design inspired by bone-brain interaction mechanisms, aiming to facilitate bone-brain interactions through materiobiological effects to aid in the treatment of neurodegenerative and bone-related diseases. Notably, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in biomaterial design is highlighted, showcasing AI's role in expediting the formulation of effective and targeted treatment strategies. In conclusion, this review offers vital insights into the mechanisms of bone-brain interaction and suggests advanced approaches to harness these interactions in clinical practice. These insights offer promising avenues for preventing and treating complex diseases impacting the skeleton and brain, underscoring the potential of interdisciplinary approaches in enhancing human health.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsBone and BonesBrainAnimalsHumansBiocompatible Materials

Identifiers

PMID40097409
PMCPMC11914511

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.