Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40097516›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Mechanisms creating homogamy in depressiveness in couples: A longitudinal study from Czechia.

Zsófia Csajbók, Jakub Fořt, Peter K Jonason, Jan Havlíček, Jakub Binter, Zuzana Štěrbová

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zsófia CsajbókDepartment of Psychology and Life Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Charles University, Pátkova 5, 182 00, Prague 8, Czech Republic. zsofia.csajbok@fhs.cuni.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5800-1597
Jakub FořtDepartment of Psychology and Life Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Charles University, Pátkova 5, 182 00, Prague 8, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1980-3607
Peter K JonasonPsychology Research Institute, University of Economics and Human Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8833-048X
Jan HavlíčekDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2374-7337
Jakub BinterDepartment of Regional Development and Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Economic Studies, University of Jan Evangelista Purkyně, Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5304-2130
Zuzana ŠtěrbováDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0158-922X

Funding

Charles University, Faculty of Humanities, Cooperatio Program, research area Psychological Sciences 207 015; 207 333Grantová Agentura České Republiky 23-05379S
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Couples often resemble each other in characteristics like depression, but the reasons for this homogamy (i.e., similarity) remain unclear. We investigated two potential mechanisms: preference for a self-similar partner and convergence (i.e., increasing similarity) over time. In a nationally representative sample of 2,793 Czech individuals who we surveyed three times in one year, we examined self-reports of participants', their ideal partners', and their actual partners' "pessimism and depressiveness". Participants preferred partners less depressive than themselves, yet their actual partners were more depressive than desired. Those who ended their relationships showed a greater ideal-versus-actual partner discrepancy than those who stayed together. In stable relationships, individuals adjusted their ideal preferences to align more closely with their actual partners over time. We identified four relationship classes with latent class growth modeling based on self and partner evaluations: both non-depressive, both depressive, self depressive and partner non-depressive, and self non-depressive and partner depressive. Romantic relationships were most stable when both partners were non-depressive and most likely to dissolve when both were depressive. While we failed to detect convergence overall, we found it within heterogamous (i.e., dissimilar) classes. Overall, our findings suggest that homogamy and heterogamy in depressiveness are complexly associated with relationship maintenance.

Indexed as

DepressionMarriageSexual PartnersAdultCzech RepublicFemaleHumansInterpersonal RelationsLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedSelf ReportYoung AdultAssortative matingConvergenceDepressivenessHeterogamyHomogamyMate preference

Identifiers

PMID40097516
PMCPMC11914466

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.