Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40097519›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Unraveling shared diagnostic genes and cellular microenvironmental changes in endometriosis and recurrent implantation failure through multi-omics analysis.

Dongxu Qin, Yongquan Zheng, Libo Wang, Zhenyi Lin, Yao Yao, Weidong Fei, Caihong Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dongxu Qin *Department of Pharmacy, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310006, China. qdxyxt@zju.edu.cn.
Yongquan Zheng *Department of Pharmacy, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310006, China. 5515058@zju.edu.cn.
Libo WangDepartment of pharmacy, Affiliated Xianju's Hospital, XianJu People's Hospital, Zhejiang Southeast Campus of Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Xianju, 317300, Zhejiang, China.
Zhenyi LinDepartment of Pharmacy, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310006, China.
Yao YaoDepartment of Pharmacy, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310006, China.
Weidong FeiDepartment of Pharmacy, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310006, China.
Caihong ZhengDepartment of Pharmacy, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310006, China.

Funding

Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation LHDMZ23H190002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometriosis and Recurrent Implantation Failure (RIF) are both pivotal clinical issues within the realm of reproductive medicine, sharing significant overlap in their pathophysiological mechanisms. However, research exploring the commonalities between these two conditions remains relatively scarce, and reliable shared diagnostic biomarkers have yet to be identified. In this study, we integrated transcriptomic and single-cell sequencing data from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database to identify shared diagnostic genes and alterations in the cellular microenvironment between EMs and RIF. Differential expression analysis and weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) were employed to identify key genes. Machine learning algorithms, including Random Forest (RF) and XGBoost, were utilized to screen for shared diagnostic genes, which were subsequently validated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and clinical prediction models. Single-cell analysis was conducted to investigate the expression patterns of these diagnostic genes across various cellular subpopulations. Additionally, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network analysis were employed to further elucidate the biological functions and regulatory mechanisms of these genes. A total of 16 key genes were identified, which were predominantly expressed in fibroblasts. Through machine learning, the optimal model combining RF and XGBoost was selected to identify the shared diagnostic genes PDIA4 and PGBD5. Single-cell analysis revealed significant differences in the expression of these diagnostic genes in fibroblasts between normal and disease states. ROC analysis showed that the Area Under the Curve (AUC) values for individual genes in disease diagnosis were all above 0.7. The constructed clinical prediction model demonstrated robust predictive capacity for the disease. Immune infiltration analysis indicated that M2 macrophages and γδ T cells play important roles in the pathogenesis of EMs and RIF. GSEA revealed that these genes are involved in immune responses, vascular function, and hormone regulation, and are regulated by miR-3121-3p. This study provides comprehensive insights into the shared cellular microenvironmental alterations and molecular mechanisms underlying EMs and RIF. The identification of PDIA4 and PGBD5 as shared diagnostic biomarkers offers new avenues for early diagnosis and targeted treatment of EMs-related RIF. Future work will focus on validating these findings in larger cohorts and exploring their therapeutic potential.

Indexed as

Cellular MicroenvironmentEmbryo ImplantationEndometriosisBiomarkersFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksHumansMachine LearningMultiomicsProtein Disulfide-IsomerasesROC CurveSingle-Cell AnalysisTranscriptomeBiomarkersProtein Disulfide-IsomerasesEndometriosisMachine learningPDIA4PGBD5Recurrent implantation failure

Identifiers

PMID40097519
PMCPMC11914081

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.