Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40097594›Full record

ArticleHeredity2025

Forest tree breeding using genomic Markov causal models: a new approach to genomic tree breeding improvement.

Esteban J Jurcic, Joaquín Dutour, Pamela V Villalba, Carmelo Centurión, Rodolfo J C Cantet, Sebastián Munilla, Eduardo P Cappa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Esteban J JurcicInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Instituto de Recursos Biológicos, Centro de Investigación en Recursos Naturales, De los Reseros y Dr. Nicolás Repetto s/n, Buenos Aires, Hurlingham, Argentina. jurcic.esteban@inta.gob.ar.ORCID 0000-0002-0881-1268
Joaquín DutourForestal Oriental, UPM, Paysandú, Uruguay.
Pamela V VillalbaInstituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular (IABiMo), INTA-CONICET, De Los Reseros y Dr. Nicolás Repetto s/n, Buenos Aires, Hurlingham, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0001-6983-9742
Carmelo CenturiónForestal Oriental, UPM, Paysandú, Uruguay.
Rodolfo J C CantetAcademia Nacional de Agronomía y Veterinaria, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0001-6282-146X
Sebastián MunillaDepartamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0003-2666-2566
Eduardo P CappaInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Instituto de Recursos Biológicos, Centro de Investigación en Recursos Naturales, De los Reseros y Dr. Nicolás Repetto s/n, Buenos Aires, Hurlingham, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-6234-2263

Funding

Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA) 2019-PE-E6-I146-001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditionally, a pedigree-based individual-tree mixed model (ABLUP) has been used in forest genetic evaluations to identify individuals with the highest breeding values (BVs). ABLUP is a Markovian causal model, as any individual BV can be expressed as a linear regression on its parental BVs. The regression coefficients are based on the genealogical parent-offspring relationship and are equal to one-half. This study aimed to develop and apply two new causal models that replace these fixed coefficients with ones calculated using genomic information, specifically derived from the genomic-based relationship matrix. We compared the performance of these genomic-based causal models with ABLUP and non-causal GBLUP models. To do so, we evaluated a four-generation population of Eucalyptus grandis, consisting of 3082 genotyped trees with 14,033 single nucleotide polymorphism markers. Six traits were assessed in 1219 trees across the first three breeding cycles. The heritability and genetic means estimates were higher in the causal pedigree- and genomic-based models compared to GBLUP. Realized genetic gains were similar across all models, but the causal models more closely matched the predicted gains than GBLUP. In turn, GBLUP demonstrated better predictive performance, albeit with lower precision. The causal models developed in this study enable discerning intra-familial variations in the predictions of BVs at a lower computational burden and offer a potential alternative to the GBLUP model.

Indexed as

EucalyptusGenomicsModels, GeneticPlant BreedingTreesForestsGenome, PlantGenotypeMarkov ChainsPedigreePhenotypePolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID40097594
PMCPMC12056201

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.