ArticleHeredity2025
Forest tree breeding using genomic Markov causal models: a new approach to genomic tree breeding improvement.
Article in Heredity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditionally, a pedigree-based individual-tree mixed model (ABLUP) has been used in forest genetic evaluations to identify individuals with the highest breeding values (BVs). ABLUP is a Markovian causal model, as any individual BV can be expressed as a linear regression on its parental BVs. The regression coefficients are based on the genealogical parent-offspring relationship and are equal to one-half. This study aimed to develop and apply two new causal models that replace these fixed coefficients with ones calculated using genomic information, specifically derived from the genomic-based relationship matrix. We compared the performance of these genomic-based causal models with ABLUP and non-causal GBLUP models. To do so, we evaluated a four-generation population of Eucalyptus grandis, consisting of 3082 genotyped trees with 14,033 single nucleotide polymorphism markers. Six traits were assessed in 1219 trees across the first three breeding cycles. The heritability and genetic means estimates were higher in the causal pedigree- and genomic-based models compared to GBLUP. Realized genetic gains were similar across all models, but the causal models more closely matched the predicted gains than GBLUP. In turn, GBLUP demonstrated better predictive performance, albeit with lower precision. The causal models developed in this study enable discerning intra-familial variations in the predictions of BVs at a lower computational burden and offer a potential alternative to the GBLUP model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.