ArticleScientific reports2025
Electrocardiogram analysis for cardiac arrhythmia classification and prediction through self attention based auto encoder.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning-enabled ECG arrhythmia classification: a systematic and educational study from signal processing to decision support.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- HAT-ECG: Hybrid autoencoder-transformer architecture for ECG arrhythmia classification.Physiological reports · 2026Article
- RT-AFNet: A Hybrid ResNet-Transformer Architecture with Multi-Scale Fusion for Atrial Fibrillation Detection.Biosensors · 2026Article
- Automated multi-class ECG arrhythmia detection using VMD and multi-task optimization.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Lightweight and interpretable edge intelligence AI with intrusion detection for trustworthy cardiac arrhythmia in medical IoT.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- MS-LTCAF: A Multi-Scale Lead-Temporal Co-Attention Framework for ECG Arrhythmia Detection.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Arrhythmia Classification with Single-Channel Features Extracted from "A Large-Scale 12-Lead ECG Database for Arrhythmia Study".Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks for predicting carotid intima-media thickness in cardiovascular risk assessment.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sudden cardiac arrest among young people is a recent worldwide risk, and it is noticed that people with cardiac arrhythmia are more susceptible to various heart diseases. Manual classification can be error-prone, and certainly, there is a need for automation to classify ECG signals to predict cardiac arrhythmia accurately. The proposed self-attention artificial intelligence auto-encoder algorithm proved an effective cardiac arrhythmia classification strategy with a novel modified Kalman filter pre-processing. We achieved 24.00 SNRimp, 0.055 RMSE, 22.1 PRD% for -5db, 20.4 SNRimp, 0.0245 RMSE, 12 PRD% whereas 14.05 SNRimp, 0.010 RMSE, and 7.25 PRD%, which reduces the ECG signal noise during the pre-processing and improves the visibility of the QRS complex and R-R peaks of ECG waveform. The extracted features were used in network of neurons to execute the classification for MIT-BIH arrhythmia databases using the newly developed self-attention autoencoder (AE) algorithm. The results are compared with existing models, revealing that the proposed system outperforms the classification and prediction of cardiac arrhythmia with a precision of 99.91%, recall of 99.86%, and accuracy of 99.71%. It is confirmed that self-attention-AE training results are promising, and it benefits the diagnosis of ECGs for complex cardiac conditions to solve real-world heart problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.