ArticleBMC psychology2025
Aggravating and protective factors in patients' experiences of vulvodynia: a qualitative study with Italian women.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Vulvodynia on the Quality of Life of Women: A Rapid Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Psychosocial Resources and Emotional Support Needs in Women with Vulvodynia: A Lifespan Developmental and Biopsychosocial Perspective.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Psychological, Relational, and Fertility-Related Characteristics of Italian Women with Vulvodynia: A Comparative Study with Controls.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVulvodynia, a chronic pain condition affecting 15% of women aged 18-70, significantly impacts daily life and sexual functioning, contributing to self-perception issues, depression, and anxiety. This study aims to explore Italian womens' experiences, recognizing the influence of cultural background on their perceptions of chronic pain and sexual problems. Additionally, this research explores the role of family support and autoeroticism in managing vulvodynia.
methodsA total of 35 interviews were conducted with women diagnosed with vulvodynia. The transcripts of these interviews were then subjected to reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsThe analysis identified four themes: A Disabling pain; Aggravating factors: lack of support and delegitimization; Protective factors: experiences of sexual agency and relational support; Identity in reconstruction: an incomplete woman. DISCUSSION: This study confirmed a lack of medical knowledge, hindering accurate diagnosis and treatment. Women's unmet expectations of family support amplified their sense of abandonment. Two factors reduced the burden of the disease. First, women were able to find alternatives to penetrative sex, gaining more confidence in themselves and their sexuality. Second, they developed empowering relationships in online patient groups where they were able to access valuable information and receive emotional support. This study underscores the necessity of multidisciplinary care for women with vulvodynia, addressing their various needs.
conclusionsPsychological interventions involving partners and families can mitigate women's delegitimization, and treatments centered on autoeroticism can promote women's overall well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.