Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40098149›Full record

Trial reportBMC psychiatry2025

Digital multimodal intervention for cancer-related cognitive impairment in breast-cancer patients: Cog-Stim feasibility study.

Giulia Binarelli, Florence Joly, François Christy, Bénédicte Clarisse, Marie Lange

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04213365 (Management of Cognitive Difficulties After Cancer Treatments in Women Treated for Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04213365 nacompletednot on this map

Management of Cognitive Difficulties After Cancer Treatments in Women Treated for Breast Cancer: Feasibility Study (Step 1 of the Cog-Stim Protocol)

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Francois BaclesseRan2020 to 2022Enrolled20ConditionsBreast CancerArmsCognitive stimulation sessions coupled with Adapted Physical Activity sessions.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Letter to the editor to "The effect of non-pharmacological interventions on cognitive function in cancer: an overview of systematic reviews".Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Giulia BinarelliANTICIPE U1086 INSERM, Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre Le Cancer, Services Unit PLATON, Cancer and Cognition Platform, Université de Caen Normandie, Normandie Université, Caen, 14000, France.
Florence JolyANTICIPE U1086 INSERM, Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre Le Cancer, Services Unit PLATON, Cancer and Cognition Platform, Université de Caen Normandie, Normandie Université, Caen, 14000, France.
François ChristyClinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, 3 Avenue Général Harris, Caen, 14076, France.
Bénédicte ClarisseClinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, 3 Avenue Général Harris, Caen, 14076, France.
Marie LangeANTICIPE U1086 INSERM, Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre Le Cancer, Services Unit PLATON, Cancer and Cognition Platform, Université de Caen Normandie, Normandie Université, Caen, 14000, France. m.lange@baclesse.unicancer.fr.

Funding

Institut National Du Cancer RISP19-033_AM, INCA_13703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis feasibility study evaluated adherence and effectiveness to a digital multimodal intervention (cognitive and physical training) for cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) in patients with breast cancer.

methodsBreast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy and with significant cognitive complaints impacting quality of life participated in a 12-week intervention, combining non-simultaneous 20-min cognitive and 30-min physical sessions, twice weekly. Assessments included perceived cognitive impairment (PCI), objective cognition, fatigue, anxiety/depression, sleep and satisfaction. High level of adherence was defined as completing 9/12 weeks of the program. A week was complete when at least 70% of each of the planned sessions was completed. Physical activity intensity was defined by max age-related heart rate.

resultsAmong 419 radiotherapy-treated patients with breast cancer, 170 had cognitive complaints (41%), 83 were eligible (49%), 29 were not included (35%) due to organizational issue and 20 among eligible contacted patients agreed to participate (37%). The majority of participants (48.3 ± 8 years of age) received chemotherapy (18/20) and 17 had I-II cancer stage. Eleven of twenty participants were highly adherent (higher adherence in physical (95%) than cognitive training (55%)). All expressed satisfaction. Post-intervention, overall objective cognition (p = 0.016), PCI (p = 0.004), fatigue (p = 0.011), and depression (p = 0.049) significantly improved. Post-intervention, high adherence was associated with significant improvements in PCI (p = 0.01) and fatigue (p = 0.03). High-intensity physical training was associated with significant improvements in PCI (p < 0.05), fatigue (p = 0.011) and depression (p = 0.037).

conclusionsThis intervention showed to be feasible and potentially efficient for the management of CRCI in patients with breast cancer.

trial registrationNCT04213365, 27/12/2019.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCognitive Behavioral TherapyCognitive DysfunctionExercise TherapyAdultAgedDepressionFatigueFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPatient ComplianceQuality of LifeBreast cancerCancer-Related Cognitive ImpairmentCognitive trainingDigital interventionPhysical activityQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID40098149
PMCPMC11916931

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.