Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40098335›Full record

ArticleBiology of the cell2025

Advantages and Limitations of Photoconvertible Probes to Study Subcellular Dynamics in Epithelial Cells.

Mathieu Pinot, Marie André, Chantal Roubinet, Céline Bruelle, Roland Le Borgne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology of the cell, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mathieu PinotCNRS, UMR 6290, Rennes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4029-3437
Marie AndréIGBMC (Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et cellulaire), Equipe Physique cellulaire, CNRS UMR 7104, Inserm U1258, Illkirch cedex, France.
Chantal RoubinetCNRS, UMR 6290, Rennes, France.
Céline BruelleCNRS, UMR 6290, Rennes, France.
Roland Le BorgneCNRS, UMR 6290, Rennes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6892-278X

Funding

French National Research Agency ANR-10-INBS-04R.L.B. ANR-20-CE13-0015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent development of a wide variety of genetically encoded photoconvertible fluorescent proteins has made it possible to study unprecedented dynamic processes by monitoring sub-populations of cells or labeled proteins. The use of photoconvertible fluorescent proteins, such as Eos, KAEDE, mMaple3, Dendra2 is a major advance. However, the conditions of their use in vivo and the inherent potential side-effects remain poorly characterized. Here, we used Drosophila pupal notum to characterize in vivo the conditions for photoconversion (PC) at the subcellular level. We compared the ability to photoconvert proteins exhibiting distinct localization and dynamics, namely, cytosolic and transmembrane proteins fused to photoconvertible probes and expressed at physiological levels. We report that the restriction of PC to a predefined region of interest depends on the mobility of the tagged protein, the power of the PC laser and the number of iterations. We characterized the axial spreading inherent to one-photon microscopy, which results in a PC cone that limits probe tracking on the z-axis. We discussed how the use of a two-photon laser can overcome this issue. We detail biases in the use of photoconvertible probes and propose strategies to circumvent them. Overall, our study provides a framework to study protein behavior at the subcellular level in living organisms.

Indexed as

Epithelial CellsFluorescent DyesLuminescent ProteinsAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterFluorescent DyesLuminescent Proteinscellular imagingdiffusionfluorescence techniqueslight microscopy

Identifiers

PMID40098335
PMCPMC11914868

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.