Evidence mapPaperPMID 40098337Full record

ArticleJournal of extracellular vesicles2025

Gut Microbiota-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Influence Alcohol Intake Preferences in Rats.

Macarena Díaz-Ubilla, Aliosha I Figueroa-Valdés, Hugo E Tobar, María Elena Quintanilla, Eugenio Díaz, Paola Morales, Pablo Berríos-Cárcamo, Daniela Santapau, Javiera Gallardo, Cristian de Gregorio and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of extracellular vesicles, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Prenatal Exposure to Low Alcohol and Alcohol Motivation in the Offspring.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Macarena Díaz-UbillaCenter for Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Clínica Alemana-Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile.
Aliosha I Figueroa-ValdésCenter of Interventional Medicine for Precision and Advanced Cellular Therapy (IMPACT), Santiago, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7431-5046
Hugo E TobarCenter of Interventional Medicine for Precision and Advanced Cellular Therapy (IMPACT), Santiago, Chile.
María Elena QuintanillaMolecular and Clinical Pharmacology Program, Institute of Biomedical Science, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Eugenio DíazMolecular and Clinical Pharmacology Program, Institute of Biomedical Science, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Paola MoralesMolecular and Clinical Pharmacology Program, Institute of Biomedical Science, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Pablo Berríos-CárcamoCenter for Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Clínica Alemana-Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile.
Daniela SantapauCenter for Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Clínica Alemana-Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile.
Javiera GallardoCenter for Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Clínica Alemana-Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile.
Cristian de GregorioCenter for Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Clínica Alemana-Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile.
Juan UgaldeCenter for Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology, Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago, Chile.
Carolina RojasCentro de Investigación e Innovación Biomédica (CIIB), Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Los Andes, Santiago, Chile.
Antonia Gonzalez-MadridCenter for Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Clínica Alemana-Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile.
Marcelo EzquerCenter for Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Clínica Alemana-Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile.
Yedy IsraelMolecular and Clinical Pharmacology Program, Institute of Biomedical Science, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Francisca Alcayaga-MirandaCenter of Interventional Medicine for Precision and Advanced Cellular Therapy (IMPACT), Santiago, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6562-5699
Fernando EzquerCenter for Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Clínica Alemana-Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7696-4215

Funding

Fondo de Financiamiento de Centros de Investigación en Áreas Prioritarias ACT210012Fondo de Financiamiento de Centros de Investigación en Áreas Prioritarias FB210024Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico 1240162
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Growing preclinical and clinical evidence suggests a link between gut microbiota dysbiosis and problematic alcohol consumption. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are key mediators involved in bacteria-to-host communication. However, their potential role in mediating addictive behaviour remains unexplored. This study investigates the role of gut microbiota-derived bacterial extracellular vesicles (bEVs) in driving high alcohol consumption. bEVs were isolated from the gut microbiota of a high alcohol-drinking rat strain (UChB rats), either ethanol-naïve or following chronic alcohol consumption and administered intraperitoneally or orally to alcohol-rejecting male and female Wistar rats. Both types of UChB-derived bEVs increased Wistar's voluntary alcohol consumption (three bottle choice test) up to 10-fold (p < 0.0001), indicating that bEVs are able and sufficient to transmit drinking behaviour across different rat strains. Molecular analysis revealed that bEVs administration did not induce systemic or brain inflammation in the recipient animals, suggesting that the increased alcohol intake triggered by UChB-derived bEVs operates through an inflammation-independent mechanism. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the vagus nerve mediates the bEV-induced increase in alcohol consumption, as bilateral vagotomy completely abolished the high drinking behaviour induced by both intraperitoneally injected and orally administered bEVs. Thus, this study identifies bEVs as a novel mechanism underlying gut microbiota-induced high alcohol intake in a vagus nerve-dependent manner.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingExtracellular VesiclesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsEthanolFemaleMaleRatsRats, WistarVagus NerveEthanoladdictive behaviouralcohol consumptionbacterial vesiclesbEVsgut microbiotainflammationmicrobiota‐derived EVsvagus nerve

Identifiers

PMID40098337
PMCPMC11913890

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.