ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2025
Vocal pitch enables differential motor learning of speech segments.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sensory feedback is crucial for accurate motor control. One process of movement correction is sensorimotor adaptation, or motor learning in response to perceived sensory errors. Recent studies demonstrate that people can adapt to opposing errors on a single movement given a context that differentiates when each error occurs. In speech production, linguistic structure (e.g., the same vowel in different words) can provide context for differential adaptation, but it is unclear whether this is restricted to the same effectors (i.e., lips, tongue, jaw) or also includes movements of other speech effectors (i.e., the larynx). Reaching studies show that contextual movements need not be produced with the same effector as the learning target, but so far, they have only tested left-right pairs. We present three simultaneous adaptation experiments in speech that examine whether laryngeal movements for pitch can provide context for oral articulator movements for vowels. In each experiment, the resonances that correlate with vowel articulator position were perturbed in three directions that were predictable given a pitch context. First, Mandarin speakers differentially adapted given pitch contexts that signal differences in word meaning, suggesting that lexical pitch provides context for vowels. Second, English speakers differentially adapted given arbitrary pitch matching contexts on the word "head," suggesting that nonmeaningful pitch movements provide context for vowels. Third, English speakers did not differentially adapt when listening to contextual pitch, indicating that mere auditory input of pitch is insufficient. Together, these results suggest that sensorimotor context for learning can be provided by effectors other than the learning target.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.