Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40098484›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2025

Vocal pitch enables differential motor learning of speech segments.

Robin Karlin, Emily Tesch, Ding-Lan Tang, Yuyu Zeng, Caroline A Niziolek, Benjamin Parrell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Robin KarlinDepartment of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1994-5816
Emily TeschDepartment of Speech and Hearing Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States.ORCID 0009-0003-0234-4990
Ding-Lan TangAcademic Unit of Human Communication, Learning, and Development (HCLD), The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-5128-278X
Yuyu ZengWaisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4014-3992
Caroline A NiziolekWaisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6085-1371
Benjamin ParrellWaisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2610-2884

Funding

Waisman Center Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research CenterP50HD105353 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Brittany Gail Travers · 2021 to 2026
$8.5M
Establishing the clinical utility of sensorimotor adaptation for speech rehabilitationR01DC019134 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI NIZIOLEK, CAROLINE, PARRELL, BENJAMIN · 2021 to 2025
$2.1M
Differential contributions of domain-general cerebellar timing mechanisms to temporal deficits in ataxic dysarthriaF32DC019535 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KARLIN, ROBIN · 2021 to 2022
$143k
National Science Foundation (NSF) BCS 2120506NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD105353NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC019535NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC019134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory feedback is crucial for accurate motor control. One process of movement correction is sensorimotor adaptation, or motor learning in response to perceived sensory errors. Recent studies demonstrate that people can adapt to opposing errors on a single movement given a context that differentiates when each error occurs. In speech production, linguistic structure (e.g., the same vowel in different words) can provide context for differential adaptation, but it is unclear whether this is restricted to the same effectors (i.e., lips, tongue, jaw) or also includes movements of other speech effectors (i.e., the larynx). Reaching studies show that contextual movements need not be produced with the same effector as the learning target, but so far, they have only tested left-right pairs. We present three simultaneous adaptation experiments in speech that examine whether laryngeal movements for pitch can provide context for oral articulator movements for vowels. In each experiment, the resonances that correlate with vowel articulator position were perturbed in three directions that were predictable given a pitch context. First, Mandarin speakers differentially adapted given pitch contexts that signal differences in word meaning, suggesting that lexical pitch provides context for vowels. Second, English speakers differentially adapted given arbitrary pitch matching contexts on the word "head," suggesting that nonmeaningful pitch movements provide context for vowels. Third, English speakers did not differentially adapt when listening to contextual pitch, indicating that mere auditory input of pitch is insufficient. Together, these results suggest that sensorimotor context for learning can be provided by effectors other than the learning target.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalLearningMotor ActivityPitch PerceptionSpeechAdultFemaleHumansLarynxMaleYoung Adultaltered auditory feedbackcontextual learningsensorimotor adaptationspeech production

Identifiers

PMID40098484
PMCPMC12184841

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.