ReviewFrontiers in neurology2025
Difficulty and prospects of endovascular treatment for spontaneous intracranial artery dissection.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Research progress in intracranial artery dissections over past 25 years: a review and bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracranial artery dissections (IADs) are relatively uncommon. For ruptured IADs and unruptured IADs with acute large artery occlusion, the size increases significantly during follow-up, or there are signs of compression with mass occupation. Intervention can be suggested. Currently, endovascular treatment (EVT) is the choice for treating IADs. However, the understanding of EVT for IADs remains limited; therefore, a thorough review is necessary on the basis of a literature review and our experience. In this review, the following issues are discussed: the incidence and natural history of IADs, angiography of IADs, EVT indications for IADs, EVT techniques to treat IADs, the prognosis and complications of EVT for IADs, and EVT techniques for each IAD. After reviewing the literature and on the basis of our experience, the review revealed that when IADs need intervention, deconstructive or reconstructive EVTs can be chosen as an effective option on case-by-case basis to achieve a good prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.