Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40098743›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025

Predicting 3-year all-cause mortality in rectal cancer patients based on body composition and machine learning.

Xiangyong Li, Zeyang Zhou, Xiaoyang Zhang, Xinmeng Cheng, Chungen Xing, Yong Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiangyong LiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Zeyang ZhouDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Xiaoyang ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Xinmeng ChengDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Chungen XingDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Yong WuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The composition of abdominal adipose tissue and muscle mass has been strongly correlated with the prognosis of rectal cancer. This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning (ML) predictive model for 3-year all-cause mortality after laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LaTME). Methods: Patients who underwent LaTME surgery between January 2018 and December 2020 were included and randomly divided into training and validation cohorts. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) image parameters and clinical characteristics were collected to establish seven ML models for predicting 3-year survival post-LaTME. The optimal model was determined based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The SHAPley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values were utilized to interpret the optimal model. Results: A total of 186 patients were recruited and divided into a training cohort (70%, Conclusion: By integrating body composition, multiple ML predictive models were developed and validated for predicting all-cause mortality after rectal cancer surgery, with the XGBoost model exhibiting the best performance.

Indexed as

machine learningnutritionpredictive modelprognosisrectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID40098743
PMCPMC11911182

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.