ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Confirmatory factor analyses of the Mandarin Chinese version of the perceived stressors in intensive care units among healthcare professionals.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Perceived Stressors in Intensive Care Units (PS-ICU) scale was designed to assess both general and occupational stressors experienced by healthcare professionals (HCPs) under normal circumstances. It has demonstrated good psychometric properties in three languages: French, Spanish, and Italian. The aim of the present study was to translate the scale into Mandarin Chinese and to examine its construct validity and reliability. Methods: This study was conducted from April 2022 to October 2023. In phase I, the scale was translated into Mandarin Chinese following the Cross-cultural adaptation guidelines and reviewed by expert panels. In phase II, the reliability and validation were tested by 530 HCPs working in tertiary grade A hospitals from two provinces (Shandong and Sichuan) in China. Fifty participants were contacted to evaluate the test-retest reliability and underwent a follow-up investigation 2 weeks after completing the initial online survey. Results: The content validity ratio for the 50 questions varied between 0.8 and 1, with every item having S-CVI values exceeding 0.92. After removing 4 items, the Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) results revealed six factors. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) affirmed construct homogeneity, comprising of (1) lack of fit with families and the organizational functioning, (2) emotional load associated with patient and family, (3) difficulties associated with teamwork, (4) issues associated with workload and human resource management, (5) issues associated with complex/at-risk situations and skill, (6) and suboptimal care situations. The comprehensive scale displayed strong internal consistency (the total Cronbach's Conclusion: The final 46-item Mandarin Chinese version of the PS-ICU scale is reliable and valid for evaluating perceived stressors among HCPs under normal ICU conditions. It may significantly identify perceived stressors in the ICU providing a foundation for focused intervention research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.