ArticleBMJ oncology2025
Incidence of prostate cancer in men with testosterone deficiency and a family history of prostate cancer receiving testosterone therapy: a comparative study.
Article in BMJ oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comment on: Variations in diagnostic criteria for male hypogonadism: is there a need for standardizing specialist society guidelines?International journal of impotence research · 2026Article
- Re-evaluating testosterone therapy: new insights for men with familial prostate cancer risk.BMJ oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the incidence of any PCa diagnosis in men with testosterone deficiency (TD) who have a family history of PCa and were prescribed TTh compared with a control cohort of men with TD with a family history of PCa but who were not prescribed TTh, over a period of 10 years. Methods and analysis: Retrospective cohort study using data from 1 January 2012 to 7 March 2024 (TriNetX database). After meeting the inclusion criteria, 3041 men were analysed: 628 with family history of PCa and TD who received TTh, and 2413 who did not. We used propensity score matching to balance baseline characteristics between cohorts. The main outcomes were the risk of any PCa diagnosis and any active treatment (including radical prostatectomy, androgen deprivation therapy, brachytherapy, radiation and cryoablation) among men with TD who received TTh versus a matched cohort who did not. Results: Over 10 years, the risk of PCa diagnosis did not significantly differ between men who received TTh (6.26%) and those who did not (5.46%), HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.28. Similarly, no significant difference was found in the risk of receiving any active treatment for PCa between those who received TTh (2.73%) and those who did not (3.69%), HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.03. Conclusions: Men with TD and a family history of PCa who were prescribed TTh showed comparable risks of being diagnosed with PCa or receiving any active treatment for PCa, relative to men with analogous TD and family history, but who did not receive TTh.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.