ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Circadian Preference.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of circadian rhythms in the pathogenesis of myopia.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- Association Between Eye Diseases and Sleep Duration: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study.Psychiatry investigation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of blindness in developed nations. Within the retina, a subset of cells, called Patients and Methods: The Horne-Östberg Morningness-Eveningness questionnaire was administered to previously screened patients with wet AMD who received bilateral anti-vascular endothelial growth factor eye injections (study participants) as well as those without eye pathology (controls). Thirty-one study participants and 19 controls completed the survey and were included in the analysis. We used Wilcoxon rank sum test and Fisher exact test for continuous and categorical variables respectively. Results: Study participants had a higher median age compared to controls (83 vs 75, Conclusion: In this pilot study, study participants encountered greater challenges with morning exercise compared to controls. Nonetheless, there was no significant difference in chronotype between study participants and controls. The study could serve as a foundation for more extensive research exploring the interplay between vision loss and circadian rhythms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.