ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2025
Transcriptomic correlates of nutritional manipulation in a facultatively social bee.
Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Subsocial behaviour in insects consists of extended parental care and may set the stage for the evolution of cooperation through manipulation of offspring. Manipulation of brood nutrition may produce differences in developmental or adult gene regulation, but it also produces smaller offspring which may be coerced into cooperation. The eastern small carpenter bee Ceratina calcarata frequently produces a smaller under-provisioned dwarf eldest daughter (DED). These DEDs are the only offspring to forage and feed siblings. To test whether nutritional manipulation of DEDs alters gene expression, inducing cooperative sibling care, we conducted a transcriptomic study, using whole heads, to assess differences in brain gene expression among naturally provisioned regular daughters and DEDs, experimentally under-provisioned regular daughters, and experimentally supplemented DEDs, prior to social interaction. Differences in gene expression were minimal among groups but were dramatic as a function of body size as a continuous variable, suggesting that differences in gene expression are more associated with absolute differences in body size, not discrete castes or order of eclosion. Enrichment for GO terms related to hormonal regulation in small bees points to hormonal regulation of transcription factors in behavioural differences that emerge in DEDs. Subordinate behaviours thus likely involve experience and social environment, though other developmental mechanisms, such as parental care, and later adult social interactions after eclosion, may act on differences in body size and gene expression to produce the distinct behaviour of DEDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.