Trial reportJournal of cosmetic dermatology2025
Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of Home Facial Antiaging Beauty Devices Based on Meridian and Acupoint Theory.
Trial report in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe increasing use of home beauty devices for antiaging raises questions about their efficacy and safety. Traditional Chinese medicine suggests that stimulating certain meridians and acupoints can aid in antiaging. This study evaluates the effects of two popular home facial devices on facial and body aging, integrating meridian and acupoint theory.
methodsA randomized controlled trial with 90 volunteers (25-65 years) over 4 weeks assessed the devices' impact on skin aging and physical health. Participants were divided into three groups: Group Y, Group J, and a control group. Outcomes were measured using VISIA imaging, standardized photographs, and the Quality of Life Scale, with safety assessments included.
resultsOf the 90 participants, 80 completed the study. Both Group J and Group Y showed significant improvements in skin wrinkles, texture, radiance, and laxity compared to the control group (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found in physical health improvements (p > 0.05).
conclusionThe devices showed effectiveness in improving facial skin aging but require further safety verification. The potential of meridian theory integration should be explored further, with a focus on device design and user-friendliness for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.