SynthesisClinical endocrinology2025
Tools to Predict Unilateral Primary Aldosteronism and Optimise Patient Selection for Adrenal Vein Sampling: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Clinical endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bilateral Adrenal Primary Aldosteronism Is Uniformly Present in Hypertensive Afro-Caribbean First-Generation Immigrants to Western Canada.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Is It Time to Retire Aldosterone Suppression Testing?American journal of hypertension · 2026Review
- Preferences for Subtyping Primary Aldosteronism: A Discrete Choice Experiment.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2026Article
- Identifying unilateral aldosterone-producing adenomas using published algorithms and imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Endocrine connections · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePrimary aldosteronism (PA), the most common endocrine cause of hypertension, is evaluated using adrenal vein sampling (AVS), to determine if aldosterone excess is bilateral or unilateral. AVS is invasive and technically challenging; it would ideally be used only in those with unilateral PA who are candidates for surgical cure. Those with bilateral PA would benefit from a direct path to medical management before AVS. Strategic patient selection for AVS would enable judicious and cost-efficient use of this procedure. This review evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of published algorithms that aim to predict unilateral PA and therefore facilitate informed selection for AVS.
designThis systematic review was performed by searching Medline and EMBASE databases to identify published models that sought to subtype PA (PROSPERO registration CRD42021277841). Algorithms reported to predict unilateral PA and therefore select patients for AVS, using AVS and/or surgical outcomes as the gold standard, were systematically evaluated.
resultsThere were 28 studies evaluating 63 unique predictive algorithms, of which 14 were tested in multiple cohorts. These were grouped into 5 categories; those combining biochemical, radiological and demographic characteristics, those involving confirmatory testing those using biochemical results only, those involving dynamic testing, and anatomical imaging. The algorithm with the highest sensitivity for unilateral PA which has been validated in at least two cohorts, involved serum potassium, CT imaging, PAC, ARR and female sex (sensitivity 78-96%). In a hypothetical scenario of 1000 people with PA where 30% have unilateral PA, this top performing algorithm would appropriately select 234-289 people for AVS and allow 143-324 to correctly bypass AVS.
conclusionsAccurate algorithms to inform selection for AVS will ensure that AVS is only performed in patients with a high probability of unilateral PA without clear evidence of the side of lateralisation. This will lower the demand for this invasive procedure, avoid unnecessary procedural complications, and reduce associated health care costs. Further validation of the top-performing algorithms in larger and diverse cohorts will support their use in routine practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.