ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2026
Clinical outcomes according to the average daily dose of sacubitril/valsartan: a nationwide longitudinal cohort study.
Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Global trend and predictors of non-labelled sacubitril-valsartan dosing: results from IKNOW-HF survey.ESC heart failure · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsA minority of patients with heart failure (HF) are prescribed the maximal dose of the angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril/valsartan. We investigated the effectiveness of submaximal doses of sacubitril/valsartan in a real-world cohort. METHODS AND
resultsPatients with HF with reduced ejection fraction prescribed sacubitril/valsartan for ≥ 180 days between 2016 and 2020 were included from a nationwide database, and categorized into tertiles based on the average daily sacubitril/valsartan dosage. Baseline characteristics were balanced using inverse probability of treatment weighting with propensity scores. The primary outcome was a composite of HF hospitalization and all-cause mortality. The study included 3,953 patients (age 62.6 ± 12.4 years, 73.0% men). Patients on lower sacubitril/valsartan doses were older, more likely to be women, and had more comorbidities, with lower blood pressure, reduced kidney function, and lower body mass index; however, baseline characteristics were well balanced across the groups after weighting. During a mean follow-up of 2.0 ± 0.7 years, there were 808 events (20.4%). The risk of the primary outcome in the middle (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.78-1.10) and the highest dosage tertiles (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.74-1.06) did not significantly differ compared with the lowest dosage tertile (p-value = 0.384). Regarding individual outcomes, there was no significant difference in HF hospitalization; however, there was a trend toward lower mortality with higher sacubitril/valsartan dose (p-value = 0.047).
conclusionsNo significant difference was observed in the composite risk of HF hospitalization and all-cause mortality across different sacubitril/valsartan dosage groups. This suggests that the benefits of sacubitril/valsartan treatment may not necessarily be dose-dependent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.