ArticleArchives of dermatological research2025
Differences in clinical features and risk factors for striae distensae in Black and White women.
Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells derived conditioned medium in the treatment of striae distensae: a double blind randomized clinical trial.Stem cell research & therapy · 2024Trial
- Striae gravidarum in the Han Chinese pregnant population: identifying genetic markers and risk factors through a prospective cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Striae distensae (SD) are a common condition, which can appear differently across skin colors and for which effective treatments remain limited. SD have several risk factors, including pregnancy, obesity, growth spurts, and several pathologic conditions. Few studies have examined whether there are skin color differences regarding SD in their clinical presentation, risk factors, and associated comorbidities. To evaluate the clinical features, risk factors, and associated comorbidities of SD among Black and White women. This was a two-part study involving a telephone questionnaire followed by an in-person clinical assessment with standardized photographs. One hundred forty-three women (75 Black, 68 White) completed the survey, and 66 women (33 Black, 33 White) completed the in-person clinical assessment. Black and White women in the study were found to be similar in age, SD duration, parity, pregnancy-associated weight gain, and family history. Black women, on average, had a greater number of SD than White women (118 versus 76, p = 0.01). Striae were typically white and skin-colored among Black women, but white and violaceous among White women (p = 0.02). Black women were more likely to have involvement of the lower legs (p = 0.04), axilla (p = 0.05), and buttocks (p = 0.002) than White women. Compared to Black women, urinary incontinence was more commonly reported among White women, though this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.07). There was a significant association between smoking and SD in White women (p = 0.003), but not in Black women. Additionally, Black women were more likely to use creams to diminish the appearance of their striae. While the etiology, prevalence, and risk factors of SD may be similar between Black and White women, there may be important skin color differences in SD clinical features and medical comorbidities. Larger studies are needed to further characterize the relationship between SD and medical comorbidities such as urinary incontinence and pelvic floor dysfunction. The study of this relationship may advance understanding of SD pathogenesis and provide pathways for targeted therapies. More studies are needed to determine the role of SD evaluation as a screening tool to help predict the risk of the development of pelvic floor dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.