Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40100795›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

Universal health coverage-Exploring the what, how, and why using realist review.

Aklilu Endalamaw, Tesfaye Setegn Mengistu, Resham B Khatri, Eskinder Wolka, Daniel Erku, Anteneh Zewdie, Yibeltal Assefa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Trend analysis and modelling of universal health coverage, Ethiopia.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aklilu EndalamawSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9121-6549
Tesfaye Setegn MengistuSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Resham B KhatriSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5216-606X
Eskinder WolkaInternational Institute for Primary Health Care-Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Daniel ErkuSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Anteneh ZewdieInternational Institute for Primary Health Care-Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Yibeltal AssefaSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Universal health coverage (UHC) is a critical target in many health system strategies to achieve 'good health and wellbeing'. Evidence on the meaning and scope of UHC and the strategies required to achieve it are needed, as variations in its understanding and implementation have risen. This realist review was conducted to fill the knowledge gap by synthesising evidence on the meaning, components, significance, and strategies of UHC. A review of evidence was conducted based on realist synthesis. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science for published materials and websites for grey literature. We have followed some steps: define the scope of the review and develop initial programme theory, search for evidence, data extraction, and synthesise evidence. This review revealed that universal coverage, universal health, universal healthcare, universal access, and insurance coverage are used interchangeably with UHC. It is a legal notion that embodies a human rights-based and collaborative approach to ensure fair and comprehensive health care services. Universal health coverage is relevant for three macro reasons: first, it prevents and reduces the impact of diseases; second, it addresses inequality and promotes equity; and third, it is key for global health security. Various mechanisms are involved to implement UHC, such as health insurance, social health protection, digital financing systems, value-based care, private sectors, civil societies, partnerships, primary health care, and reciprocal health care systems. In conclusion, universal health coverage is a multifaceted concept that various terms can express in different contexts. Universal health coverage is a political and ethical imperative that aims to promote health equity and protect human dignity across different levels of society. It is essential in preventing diseases and crucial to global health security. Practically, UHC is not truly universal, as it does not include all services under its scheme and varies across countries. This requires consistent advocacy, strategic and operational research, and political will to ensure UHC.

Identifiers

PMID40100795
PMCPMC11918392

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.