ArticleCell reports2025
Uncovering the mechanism for polar sequestration of the major bacterial sugar regulator by high-throughput screens and 3D interaction modeling.
Article in Cell reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The bacterial phosphotransferase system-mediated rifampicin phosphorylation: ancestral links to rifampicin-inactivating enzyme.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Bacterial Amyloids as Hubs for Nucleic Acid Interactions: Implications and Mechanisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The poles of rod-shaped bacteria emerge as regulatory hubs. We have shown that enzyme I (EI), the major bacterial sugar metabolism regulator, is sequestered when not needed in TmaR phase-separated condensates in Escherichia coli cell poles. Here, we combined genetic and automated microscopy screens to identify residues in EI and TmaR that are important for their interaction and colocalization. Mutating these residues affects EI-TmaR interaction in bacteria and impairs co-phase separation in yeast. The results were used to generate an EI-TmaR interaction model, which agrees with coevolution data and is supported by conservation of the interacting residues and EI-TmaR colocalization in other species. Mutating residues predicted to interact electrostatically further supports our model. The model explains how TmaR controls EI activity and its interaction with the phosphoprotein HPr and, hence, sugar uptake. Our study highlights the importance of sugar metabolism spatial regulation during evolution and presents a way to unravel protein-protein interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.