ArticlePloS one2025
Maternal occupation and risk of adverse fetal outcomes in Tanzania: A hospital-based cross-sectional study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWomen constitute a large proportion of the workforce in today's world. Hazardous working environment conditions for these women pose threat to their reproductive health. Despite efforts to address maternal health in Tanzania, the impact of occupational risks during pregnancy remains unclear. We assessed whether maternal occupation during pregnancy is associated with adverse Foetal outcomes.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among 400 self-referred post-delivery women at a referral Hospital in Tanzania. Information on socio-demographic characteristics and maternal occupational characteristics was assessed through the use of a pre-tested questionnaire. Questions on physical demanding work and prolonged standing were obtained from the standardized Musculoskeletal Questionnaire. To assess occupational exposure to chemicals, job titles and task descriptions were linked to a job-exposure-matrix, an expert judgment on exposure to chemicals at the workplace. Information relating to obstetric characteristics and pregnancy outcomes was obtained from the medical files and clinic cards. Data was analyzed by using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23. Odds ratios > 1 was considered risk while Odds ratios < 1 was considered protective and P value < 0.05 was considered significant.
resultsThe mean age was 28.0 ± 6.3. Out of 400 post-delivery women studied, 174 (43.5%) were engaged in various occupations. Agriculture (22.4%) was the most prevalent occupation followed by tailoring (19.0%). Relative to the referent group of other occupations, agriculture workers, had higher adjusted odds ratios of congenital malformation (AOR = 4.5, 95% CI; 1.6-12.8)preterm babies (AOR = 2.8, 95% CI; 1.3-7.9), low birth weight (AOR = 3.1, 95% CI; 1.4-8.4) and low Apgar score (AOR = 3.5, 95% CI; 1.3-9.5). Food vendors: low birth weight (AOR = 8.6, 95% CI; 2.7-24.8) and low Apgar score (AOR = 13.5, 95% CI; 4.5-39.4).
conclusionUnderstanding occupational characteristics and their relation to adverse Foetal outcomes is important to formulate appropriate strategies to promote and protect maternal and infant health at work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.