Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40100921›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Perspectives of health workers on malaria case referral among pregnant women attending antenatal care in Savelugu Municipality, Ghana: A qualitative descriptive study.

Martin Nyaaba Adokiya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Martin Nyaaba AdokiyaDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Disease Control, School of Public Health, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0167-5512

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalaria remains endemic in Africa, with pregnant women exposed to the dangers of complications, which require emergency referral for lifesaving interventions. This study explored the perspectives of health workers on malaria case referral among pregnant women attending antenatal care (ANC) at health facilities in Savelugu Municipality, northern Ghana.

methodsThe study employed a qualitative descriptive design with a constructivist grounded theory perspective. A semi-structured interview guide was used to collect information from thirteen health workers on face-to-face. The participants were purposefully sampled and interviewed. The data were transcribed verbatim. Content analysis was performed and the results were presented as themes and sub-themes.

resultsAfter the analysis, two main themes and six sub-themes emerged from the data: a robust referral system (patient awareness and consent, documentation, referral coordination, and post-referral feedback) and a referral mechanism (ambulance/nurse accompaniment, and transportation shortfalls/patients left to their fate). Participants described the referral system as robust but reported transport challenges as the main obstacle to its operation. The study also revealed that health workers do not accompany all referral cases.

conclusionA referral system exists in the Savelugu Municipality with transportation lapses causing delays. Health workers often failed to accompany referred cases to the referral facilities. Though an inter-sectoral approach is needed to tackle the referral transport challenges, facility managers need to ensure that all referred cases are accompanied by a designated health worker.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelMalariaPrenatal CareReferral and ConsultationAdultFemaleGhanaHumansMiddle AgedPregnancyQualitative ResearchYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40100921
PMCPMC11918396

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.