Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40101127›Full record

ReviewAsian journal of andrology2025

Andrology laboratory techniques for micro-TESE/IVF/ICSI: a narrative review.

Krishna Chaitanya Mantravadi, Christina Anagnostopoulou, Firuza R Parikh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Asian journal of andrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Krishna Chaitanya MantravadiDepartment of Clinical Embryology, Oasis Fertility, Hyderabad 500034, Telangana, India.
Christina AnagnostopoulouUnit of Reproductive Medicine Embryo ART, Lito Maternity Hospital, Athens 11524, Greece.
Firuza R ParikhFertilTree-Jaslok International Fertility Centre, Department of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, Jaslok Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai 400026, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractSince the early days of assisted reproductive technology (ART), the importance of sperm processing, employed to separate the motile, morphologically normal sperm from the semen, has been shown to be beneficial. The aim of the semen processing technique has been to remove seminal plasma and facilitate capacitation. Additionally, the presence of leukocytes, bacteria, and dead spermatozoa has been shown to be detrimental as it may cause oxidative stress that has an adverse effect on oocyte fertilization and embryo development. Hence, removal of leukocytes, bacteria, and dead spermatozoa is an important step of sperm processing for assisted reproduction. Currently, several sperm processing techniques have been evolved and optimized in the field of assisted reproduction. The requirements for in vitro fertilization (IVF), intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), and testicular sperm extraction (TESE) are different than those of intrauterine insemination (IUI). The yield of as many motile, morphologically normal sperm as possible is a prerequisite for the success of IVF insemination procedure. In ICSI, where injection of a single spermatozoon into the oocyte is performed by the embryologist, sperm selection techniques play a crucial role in the ICSI procedure. Finally, sperm retrieval in TESE samples with very low number of sperm may be challenging and requires extra care during sample processing. Additionally, sperm cryopreservation is necessary in TESE cases in order to avoid multiple biopsies.

Indexed as

AndrologyFertilization in VitroSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicSperm RetrievalCryopreservationFemaleHumansMaleSpermatozoaandrology laboratory techniquesintracytoplasmic sperm injectionmicro-testicular sperm extraction

Identifiers

PMID40101127
PMCPMC12112915

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.