SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2025
Patients' Experiences of Digital Health Interventions for the Self-Management of Chronic Pain: Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis.
Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nurse-Led Digital Intervention for Sodium Restriction in Chronic Kidney Disease: Mixed Methods Implementation Study.JMIR nursing · 2026Trial
- Patient Perceptions of a Digitally Enabled Community Health Worker Intervention: Qualitative Study Among Pilot Trial Participants.JMIR cardio · 2026Trial
- Feasibility and acceptability of a guided internet-based acceptance and commitment therapy intervention (MobACT) for adults with chronic pain in Italy: A pilot mixed-methods randomized controlled trial.Internet interventions · 2026Article
- Dual-Facing Digital Health Systems to Support Self-Management of Chronic Pain: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Early Implications for Solid Organ Transplantation With the Use of Artificial Intelligence From a Bibliometric Perspective.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2026Review
- Effectiveness of Conversational Agents on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Chronic Pain Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Systematic evaluation of commercially available pain-management mHealth apps for chronic pain in the United Kingdom.British journal of health psychology · 2026Article
- Efficacy of digital health technologies in patients with chronic pain: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2026Article
- Biophilic design, neuroarchitecture and therapeutic home environments: harnessing medicinal properties of intentionally-designed spaces to enhance digital health outcomes.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundResearch regarding the effectiveness of digital health interventions (DHIs) for people living with chronic pain is widely documented, although it is often measured against changes in clinical outcomes. To gain a comprehensive understanding of the full impact of DHIs, it is vital to understand the experience of individuals who are using them. An exploration of qualitative data regarding the experience of people living with chronic pain engaging with DHIs could provide a more in-depth account of how individuals interact and engage with such tools, uncovering the overall impact DHIs can have on the lives of people living with chronic pain.
objectiveThis qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis aimed to appraise and synthesize relevant qualitative evidence on patients' experiences of engaging with DHIs for the self-management of chronic pain symptoms.
methodsA systematic literature search of qualitative and mixed methods studies published between 2013 and 2023 was conducted across 6 databases: MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Scopus. Eligible studies included adult patients aged ≥18 years with a chronic pain diagnosis (ie, >12 weeks) reporting on the experience of engaging in a DHI for the self-management of chronic pain. The Critical Appraisal Skills Program checklist for qualitative research was used to appraise each study. Following a 3-step inductive thematic synthesis approach, the researcher performed line-by-line coding of each eligible article to identify descriptive themes. Through iterative evaluation of the descriptive themes, analytical themes that facilitated a deeper understanding of the data were derived.
resultsIn total, 37 qualitative and mixed methods studies were included in the review. Thematic synthesis revealed three overarching themes encompassing five subthemes: (1) personal growth, with 2 subthemes (gaining new insights and renewed mindset); (2) active involvement, with 3 subthemes (motivation, improved access, and health care decision-making); and (3) connectedness and support.
conclusionsA positive experience with DHIs among people living with chronic pain is achieved through an improved understanding of their condition, greater self-awareness of how symptoms impact their lives, and an increase in motivation to play an active role in their health care. DHIs promote the confidence and independence of people living with chronic pain, as well as facilitate a sense of ongoing support between routine appointments. However, DHIs may disempower people living with chronic pain by placing too much focus on their pain and should be used as an adjunct to existing care as opposed to replacing in-person appointments. To appropriately meet the needs of people living with chronic pain, the content and features of DHIs should be personalized. Development of future DHIs should use a co-design approach involving key stakeholders to ensure the needs of people living with chronic pain are met.
trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42023445100; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023445100. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/52469.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.