ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2025
Risk of Bias in Network Meta-Analysis (RoB NMA) tool.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of sequential versus concurrent administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors with radiotherapy in solid tumors: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2026Pooled it
- Bridging thrombolysis versus direct thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion: a network meta-analysis.Journal of neurology · 2025Pooled it
- The effect of plant active substances on cognitive function in healthy older adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Magnesium Sulfate in Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy: Bridging the Gap Between Molecular Neuroprotection and Clinical Outcomes.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- The use of GLP-1 receptor agonists and co-agonists in adults without diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol.Systematic reviews · 2026Article
- Review
- Naïve pooling of randomized and non-randomized evidence in network meta-analyses: a meta-epidemiological study protocol.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Exploring the methodological quality and risk of bias in 200 systematic reviews: A comparative study of ROBIS and AMSTAR-2 tools.Research synthesis methods · 2026Article
- Network Meta-Analysis and Umbrella Review: Complementary, Not Competing, Tools of Evidence Synthesis.Cureus · 2026Article
- Permanent facial palsy and recurrence rate after surgery for benign parotid tumors: pairwise and network meta-analysis of different parotid surgery techniques.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Cannabinomics in the flower of Cannabis sativa: a systematic review of extraction, analytical identification, and micro/nanoencapsulation methods for bioactive metabolites.Journal of cannabis research · 2025Review
- Interventions for endometriosis-related pain and infertility: a protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2025Article
- How trustworthy and applicable is the evidence from systematic reviews of depression treatments: Protocol for systematic examination.PloS one · 2025Article
- Comparative Effectiveness of Pharmacological, Non-Pharmacological, and Combined Strategies for Pain Relief During Colonoscopy: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.Journal of pain research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.