SynthesisAnnals of surgical oncology2025
Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy for Resectable Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Non-Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oropharynx: Primary Surgery or (Chemo)radiotherapy?Head & neck · 2026Review
- Review
- [Contrast-enhanced CT-based habitat radiomics for analyzing the predictive capability for oral squamous cell carcinoma].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2026Article
- A multimodal biological margin risk index predicts recurrence after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Anti-EGFR enhanced neoadjuvant immunotherapy versus neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy for locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNeoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy provides a good pathological response in patients with resectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Currently, there is no comprehensive systematic review that rigorously evaluates and summarizes the existing studies. In this study, we aimed to synthesize the results on the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in resectable HNSCC to obtain higher-level evidence.
methodsThe PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Academic Search Complete (EBSCO) databases, along with ClinicalTrials.gov, Google Scholar, and conference abstracts, were comprehensively searched. The publication dates of the literature were limited to January 2015-July 2024. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. The percentage of major pathological response (MPR), pathological complete response (pCR), and overall disease-free survival (DFS) were synthesized. The odds ratios of a combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 20 for MPR and the diagnostic performance of using radiological objective response to determine MPR were further explored.
resultsA total of 13 studies with 458 patients who received neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and 443 patients who underwent curative surgery were included. The pooled MPR, pCR, and overall DFS rates were 61%, 37%, and 91%, respectively. The odds ratios of a CPS ≥ 20 for achieving MPR was 2.09 compared with those with a CPS < 20. The sensitivity of using radiological objective response to determine MPR was 0.91 and the specificity was 0.46, with an area under the curve of 0.76.
conclusionNeoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy showed promising results for resectable HNSCC. A CPS ≥ 20 can be used to screen for treatment-sensitive patients, and radiological examinations can be used to detect pathological response. Definitive conclusions require data from longer follow-up periods and controlled studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40102288What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.