ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2025
Enhancing neonatal resuscitation outcomes: bridging theory and practice.
Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Standardised formal resuscitation training programmes for reducing mortality and morbidity in newborn infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of health belief model-based companion education on maternal childbirth satisfaction and outcomes: cluster randomized controlled trial.BMC public health · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neonatal resuscitation practices have undergone tremendous changes over the past two decades, with progress accelerating due to advances in medical technology, scientific research, and improvements in clinical practices. Among other global frameworks, the neonatal resuscitation program has been periodically updated to incorporate evidence-based interventions aimed at improving survival rates, reducing morbidity and enhancing long-term health outcomes for newborns. This review traces the historical development of neonatal resuscitation guidelines from the early days' resuscitation practices of the mid-twentieth century to the present day. It narrates how clinical needs, emerging technologies, and scientific discoveries have shaped the evolution of these guidelines and practices. By reviewing recent guidelines, such as those issued by the American Heart Association and the World Health Organization, this article sheds light on the current core principles of neonatal resuscitation, including effective airway management, appropriate ventilation techniques, and the critical importance of timely intervention. The major determinants of changes in guidelines, as identified through this review, include advancements in scientific research, expert opinion, and international collaboration. Challenges in implementing these guidelines, particularly in low-resource settings, are discussed, along with case studies that demonstrate the impact of updated practices in real-world clinical environments.
conclusionThe review concludes with a reflection on the continued need for research to close remaining gaps and enhance neonatal resuscitation practices across diverse global contexts. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Effective neonatal resuscitation significantly improves outcomes by reducing neonatal mortality and morbidity. • Neonatal resuscitation program provides standardized protocols to implement these resuscitation skills. WHAT IS NEW: • Simulation-based training and real-time feedback can bridge the gap between theoretical guidelines and practical application. • Despite advances in knowledge and application of these guidelines, challenges persist, such as regional differences, lack of resources in lower-income countries, and ideal ventilation devices and oxygenation methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.