Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40102450›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Performance of electrochemical aptasensor as antigen test in clinical samples for early diagnosis of leptospirosis.

Uraiwan Kositanont, Benchaporn Lertanantawong, Kanitha Patarakul, Sirinapa Sripinitchai, Charin Thawornkuno, Thanyarat Chaibun, Chahya Kreangkaiwal, Wassa Waiwinya, Chamras Promptmas, Chatchawan Srisawat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Uraiwan KositanontFaculty of Public Health, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand. uraiwan.kos@mahidol.ac.th.
Benchaporn LertanantawongDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kanitha PatarakulDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sirinapa SripinitchaiDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Charin ThawornkunoDepartment of Molecular Tropical Medicine and Genetics, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Thanyarat ChaibunDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chahya KreangkaiwalDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Wassa WaiwinyaMedical Microbiology, Interdisciplinary Program, Graduate School, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chamras PromptmasDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chatchawan SrisawatDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. chatchawan.sri@mahidol.ac.th.

Funding

Thailand Science Research and Innovation Fundamental Fund (Year 2023) Grant number 180243Thammasat University Fast Track Fund (Year 2022) Year 2022Thammasat University Research Unit in Modern Microbiology and Public Health Genomics, Thammasat University Year 2023-2024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early diagnosis of leptospirosis is critical for timely treatment and effective disease management. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of a novel electrochemical aptasensor targeting the electron transfer flavoprotein subunit beta (EtfB) of Leptospira interrogans in clinical samples collected during the acute phase of leptospirosis. The aptasensor assay was tested using plasma samples and compared to the microscopic agglutination test (MAT), the standard reference method. To assess diagnostic performance, aptasensor results were evaluated against leptospirosis status as determined by MAT. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified a 40% decrease in electrochemical signal relative to the blank as the optimal cut-off, yielding an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.93. The assay demonstrated a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 80%. For diagnostic concordance, aptasensor results were compared with those obtained from the reference quantitative PCR (qPCR) method. The aptasensor exhibited 100% positive agreement and 57.1% negative agreement with qPCR. Notably, in patients with high MAT titers, the aptasensor outperformed qPCR in detection rates (100% vs. 25%). These findings indicate that the aptasensor assay is a highly reliable and effective antigen-based diagnostic tool for early leptospirosis detection, making it suitable for both low- and high-prevalence settings.

Indexed as

Antigens, BacterialAptamers, NucleotideBiosensing TechniquesElectrochemical TechniquesLeptospira interrogansLeptospirosisAdultAgglutination TestsEarly DiagnosisFemaleHumansMaleROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityAntigens, BacterialAptamers, NucleotideAntigen testAptamer biosensorAptasensorDiagnostic performanceEarly diagnosisLeptospirosis

Identifiers

PMID40102450
PMCPMC11920073

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.