ArticleScientific reports2025
Measurement properties of the Polish version of the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire Revised 14+ in the adult population.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Determinants of health-related quality of life in adults with cystic fibrosis: the role of selected sociodemographic and treatment-related factors.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Measuring the quality of life in patients with cystic fibrosis is an important element of the patient care process. Many tools have been created for this measurement among adults. One of them is the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised 14+ (CFQ-R 14+). Its measurement properties have not been comprehensively assessed in the population of Polish adults. The aim of the study is to verify the construct validity, including structural and criterion validity, as well as internal consistency, of the Polish version of the CFQ-R 14+ in the population of adults with cystic fibrosis. We conducted a cross-sectional survey among adults with cystic fibrosis. After preparing the database, we performed a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) followed by exploratory factor analysis (EFA) using the parallel analysis method principal axis factoring with Oblimin rotation. Intercorrelations of questionnaire factors and the occurrence of relationships among items for the general scale results was checked. We also presented basic descriptive statistics (mean, median, standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis, minimum and maximum values). The analyses included responses from 220 adult patients. CFA results did not show adequate goodness of fit (χ
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.