Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40102718›Full record

ArticleBMC neuroscience2025

Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on learning and memory cognitive function in rats with vascular cognitive impairment and its neural induction mechanism.

Jiati Wang, Huan Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jiati WangDepartment of Neurology, Yan'an University Xianyang Hospital, Xianyang, 712000, Shaanxi, China.
Huan GaoDepartment of Neurology, Yan'an University Xianyang Hospital, Xianyang, 712000, Shaanxi, China. 13279510836@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe treatment of vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) is challenging, and its neurological mechanisms are not yet fully understood. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) offers a new non-invasive treatment approach.

methodsOne hundred male SD rats were grouped: intervention group (IG), model group (MG), sham group (SG), and control group (CG), to prepare the rat model of VCI. The Morris water maze (MWM) test was conducted, and oxidative stress (OS) markers, neurotrophic factors, apoptosis factors, and the amplitude of postsynaptic potential (PSP) in the hippocampus of rats were measured.

resultsPost-intervention, IG's escape latency was lower than MG but higher than SG and CG. IG's hippocampal malondialdehyde (MDA) content, Bax, and Caspase-3 (Cas-3) were lower than MG but higher than SG and CG, while the tendency was opposite for Bcl-2 expression and the content of glutathione (GSH) and superoxide dismutase (SOD). IG's brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor 1 (NMDAR1) in the hippocampus were higher than MG but lower than SG and CG; The changes in the amplitude of PSP in the hippocampal region of IG at 10, 30, and 60 min were all higher than those in MG but lower than those in SG and CG (P < 0.05).

conclusionLow-frequency rTMS visibly improved the learning and memory abilities of VCI rats and reduced OS levels.

Indexed as

CognitionCognitive DysfunctionDementia, VascularMemoryTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAnimalsBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorHippocampusMaleMaze LearningOxidative StressRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorNeural plasticityOSPSPrTMSVCI

Identifiers

PMID40102718
PMCPMC11916909

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.