ArticleBMC microbiology2025
Adoption of an in-silico analysis approach to assess the functional and structural impacts of rpoB-encoded protein mutations on Chlamydia pneumoniae sensitivity to antibiotics.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Phylogenetic relationships and antimicrobial susceptibility of human- and parrot-derivedFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAntibiotics are frequently used to treat infections caused by Chlamydia pneumoniae; an obligate intracellular gram-negative bacterium commonly associated with respiratory diseases. However, improper or overuse of these drugs has raised concerns about the development of antibiotic resistance, which poses a significant global health challenge. Previous studies have revealed a link between mutations in the rpoB-encoded protein of C. pneumoniae and antibiotic resistance. This study assessed these mutations via various bioinformatics tools to predict their impact on function, structural stability, antibiotic binding, and, ultimately, their effect on bacterial sensitivity to antibiotics.
resultsEight mutations in the rpoB-encoded protein (R421S, F450S, L456I, S454F, D461E, S476F, L478S, and S519Y) are associated with resistance to rifampin and rifalazil. These mutations occur in conserved regions of the protein, leading to decreased stability and affecting essential functional sites of RNA polymerase, the target of these antibiotics. Although the structural differences between the native and mutant proteins are minimal, notable changes in local hydrogen bonding have been observed. Despite similar binding energies, variations in hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions in certain mutants (for instance, D461E for rifalazil and S476F for rifampin) indicate that these changes may diminish ligand affinity and specificity. Furthermore, protein-protein network analysis demonstrated a strong correlation between wild-type rpoB and ten C. pneumoniae proteins, each fulfilling specific functional roles. Consequently, some of these mutations can reduce the bacterium's sensitivity to rifampin and rifalazil, thereby contributing to antibiotic resistance.
conclusionThe findings of this study indicate that mutations in the rpoB gene, which encodes the beta subunit of RNA polymerase, are pivotal in the resistance of C. pneumoniae to rifampin and rifalazil. Some of these mutations may result in reduced protein stability and changes in the structure, function, and antibiotic binding. As a consequence, the efficacy of these drugs in inhibiting RNA polymerase is compromised, allowing the bacteria to persist in transcription and replication even in the presence of antibiotics. Overall, these insights enhance our understanding of the resistance mechanisms in C. pneumoniae and could guide the development of strategies to address this challenge. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.