ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
Co-creation for the development and implementation of a competence centre for mental health in Eastern Switzerland: a participatory approach.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMental health conditions represent a significant global public health issue, affecting millions of people worldwide. To meet the increasing demands on mental health services in Switzerland, the development of a competence centre for mental health can provide the necessary structures and resources for a comprehensive and innovative approach to mental health care. This paper outlines the participatory process used in the development and implementation of a competence centre for mental health in Eastern Switzerland for the promotion of positive mental health.
methodsThe process was conducted using a participatory design and a co-creation approach. This involved the collaborative engagement of all relevant mental health stakeholders, working together as equals throughout all stages of the process. A key stakeholder group was established with N = 10 individuals, including persons with lived experience, (mental) health care professionals, researchers, educators, and decision-makers at institutional and regional levels. Between March 2020 and June 2021, four conceptualisation meetings were conducted using participatory methods and tools to facilitate collaborative, reflexive, and innovative engagement.
resultsThe participatory process resulted in a framework for a competence centre for mental health, informed by the needs and experiences of key mental health stakeholders. Three main areas were identified in which the competence centre could effect change for the promotion of positive mental health and the improvement of mental health services in Eastern Switzerland: (1) Academic teaching of future health professionals; (2) further education for current health professionals; and (3) a research agenda that provides a scientific contribution to the improved mental health care of the population.
conclusionsThe co-creation process resulted in an inclusive, practice-oriented framework for a competence centre for mental health at the intersection of research, education, and practice. By continuing to adopt a participatory approach, the competence centre can provide evidence-based training for health professionals, foster innovative and needs-based models of care, advocate for policy change, and promote best practices for the promotion and recovery of mental health. The successful development and implementation of the competence centre using a co-creation process provides encouraging support for the use of participatory approaches in the field of mental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.