ReviewCell communication and signaling : CCS2025
Ubiquitin-specific protease: an emerging key player in cardiomyopathy.
Review in Cell communication and signaling : CCS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ubiquitination-dependent regulation of ferroptosis in ischemic heart and brain.Redox biology · 2026Review
- Micro- and Nanoplastics as Potential Drivers of Dilated Cardiomyopathy.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- USP10 deubiquitinase: Physiological function, diseases and therapeutic target (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- UBA1 promotes cardiac hypertrophy by suppressing autophagy via targeting ATG5 for ubiquitination.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Article
- Ubiquitin-specific protease 25: a new regulator for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- The Ubiquitin-Proteasome System in Brain Disorders: Pathogenic Pathways, Post-Translational Tweaks, and Therapeutic Frontiers.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2025Review
- In Vivo Models of Cardiovascular Disease:Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Molecular Insights into Oxidative-Stress-Mediated Cardiomyopathy and Potential Therapeutic Strategies.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- The Ubiquitin-Proteasome System: A Key Regulatory Hub in Myocarditis Leading to Dilated Cardiomyopathy.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein quality control (PQC) plays a vital role in maintaining normal heart function, as cardiomyocytes are relatively sensitive to misfolded or damaged proteins, which tend to accumulate under pathological conditions. Ubiquitin-specific protease (USP) is the largest deubiquitinating enzyme family and a key component of the ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS), which is a non-lysosomal protein degradation machinery to mediate PQC in cells. USPs regulate the stability or activity of the target proteins that involve intracellular signaling, transcriptional control of inflammation, antioxidation, and cell growth. Recent studies demonstrate that the USPs can regulate fibrosis, lipid metabolism, glucose homeostasis, hypertrophic response, post-ischemic recovery and cell death such as apoptosis and ferroptosis in cardiomyocytes. Since myocardial cell loss is an important component of cardiomyopathy, therefore, these findings suggest that the UPSs play emerging roles in cardiomyopathy. This review briefly summarizes recent literature on the regulatory roles of USPs in the occurrence and development of cardiomyopathy, giving us new insights into the molecular mechanisms of USPs in different cardiomyopathy and potential preventive strategies for cardiomyopathy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.