ArticleBMC research notes2025
Genetic analysis of uterine lavage fluids to identify women at high risk of endometrial cancer.
Article in BMC research notes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesEndometrial cancer (EC) is the most common malignancy of the female genital tract in developed countries, yet preventive screening remains unavailable, and diagnostic approaches are largely limited to symptomatic women. Despite advancements in precision oncology, the biology of precancerous lesions is less understood compared to advanced disease. To address this gap, we conducted a prospective case-control study analysing uterine lavage fluid from women undergoing diagnostic evaluation. The study included 257 participants: 80 diagnosed with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN), 89 with early-stage EC, and 88 healthy controls. Using targeted next-generation sequencing, we examined genetic alterations in 22 selected genes associated with EC development.
resultsOur findings did not confirm a direct association between specific genetic mutations in uterine lavage fluid and the presence of EIN or early-stage EC (p = 0.501). Mutations were detected in both cases and controls, with a higher overall mutation burden observed in controls, suggesting potential background genomic alterations unrelated to EC development. In conclusion, while molecular profiling of uterine lavage fluid remains a promising concept for non-invasive diagnosis, our results highlight significant challenges in specificity. Further studies with larger cohorts and additional biomarkers are necessary to clarify its diagnostic relevance and clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.