ReviewClinical transplantation and research2025
Current status of xenotransplantation from an immunobiological standpoint.
Review in Clinical transplantation and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Comparative Analysis of Pig-to-Rhesus Corneal Xenotransplantation with Various Immunosuppressive Regimens.Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO · 2026Article
- Xenotransplantation and the organ shortage: evaluating policy priorities.Current opinion in organ transplantation · 2026Review
- Porcine xenotransplantation in the clinical era: converging advances and unresolved barriers on the path to clinical translation - a narrative review.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Review
- Review
- Use of regulatory cells for achieving functional tolerance of pig heart xenotransplants in humans: a literature review.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Xenotransplantation of the Porcine Lung-From Immunological Barriers to Emerging Experimental Strategies.XenotransplantationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Xenotransplantation, which involves the transplantation of organs, tissues, or cells from animals into humans, is emerging as a promising solution to mitigate the global shortage of human donor organs. Nonetheless, its clinical application is constrained by significant immunological and physiological barriers-most notably, the rapid rejection of xenografts by both the innate and adaptive immune systems. This review discusses critical immunological challenges such as natural antibodies, complement activation, coagulation dysregulation, and cellular immune responses mediated by T cells, macrophages, and natural killer cells. Advances in genetic engineering-such as the development of multi-knockout pigs that lack major xenoantigens and the transgenic expression of human regulatory proteins-have considerably prolonged xenograft survival in preclinical models. Moreover, approaches such as mixed hematopoietic chimerism, thymic transplantation, cell-based therapies, and synthetic particle-based delivery hold promise for inducing immune tolerance. Innovations in pharmacological immunosuppression and bioengineering, including islet encapsulation and thrombo-regulatory modifications, further enhance graft viability. While recent breakthroughs, including pig-to-human transplants, demonstrate considerable clinical potential, challenges remain in achieving long-term graft survival. This review summarizes current progress in xenotransplantation research and outlines future directions to overcome cross-species immune barriers, bringing the field closer to widespread clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.