ArticleDigital health
Automated program using convolutional neural networks for objective and reproducible selection of corneal confocal microscopy images.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Corneal Innervation Research at a Crossroads: A Tool-Driven Roadmap for the Future.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Review
- Deep learning-based segmentation and density estimation of corneal nerves and dendritic cells from In Vivo confocal microscopy images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Development of Diagnostic Nomograms Using Corneal Nerve Parameters for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- ConNeCT: weakly supervised corneal confocal microscopy image inpainting network based on a diffusion model.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a common complication of diabetes, posing a significant risk for foot ulcers and amputation. Corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is a rapid, noninvasive method to assess DPN by analysing corneal nerve fibre morphology. However, selecting high-quality representative images remains a critical challenge. Methods: In this study, we propose a fully automated CCM image-selection algorithm based on deep learning feature extraction using ResNet-18 and unsupervised clustering. The algorithm consistently identifies representative images by balancing non-redundancy and representativeness, ensuring objectivity and reproducibility. Results: When validated against manual selection by researchers with varying expertise levels, the algorithm demonstrated superior performance in distinguishing DPN and reduced inter-observer variability. It completed the analysis of hundreds of images within 1 s, significantly enhancing diagnostic efficiency. Compared with traditional manual selection, the proposed method achieved higher diagnostic accuracy for key morphological parameters, including corneal nerve fibre density, length, and branch density. Conclusion: The algorithm is open source and compatible with standard CCM workflows, offering researchers and clinicians a robust and efficient tool for DPN diagnosis. Further, multicentre studies are needed to validate these findings in diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.