Evidence mapPaperPMID 40103638Full record

ArticleDigital health

Automated program using convolutional neural networks for objective and reproducible selection of corneal confocal microscopy images.

Qincheng Qiao, Wen Xue, Jinzhe Li, Wenwen Zheng, Yongkai Yuan, Chen Li, Fuqiang Liu, Xinguo Hou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Qincheng QiaoDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7900-2984
Wen XueDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7688-8226
Jinzhe LiCollege of Intelligence Science and Technology, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, Hunan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8366-5110
Wenwen ZhengDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Yongkai YuanDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Chen LiDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Fuqiang LiuDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Xinguo HouDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a common complication of diabetes, posing a significant risk for foot ulcers and amputation. Corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is a rapid, noninvasive method to assess DPN by analysing corneal nerve fibre morphology. However, selecting high-quality representative images remains a critical challenge. Methods: In this study, we propose a fully automated CCM image-selection algorithm based on deep learning feature extraction using ResNet-18 and unsupervised clustering. The algorithm consistently identifies representative images by balancing non-redundancy and representativeness, ensuring objectivity and reproducibility. Results: When validated against manual selection by researchers with varying expertise levels, the algorithm demonstrated superior performance in distinguishing DPN and reduced inter-observer variability. It completed the analysis of hundreds of images within 1 s, significantly enhancing diagnostic efficiency. Compared with traditional manual selection, the proposed method achieved higher diagnostic accuracy for key morphological parameters, including corneal nerve fibre density, length, and branch density. Conclusion: The algorithm is open source and compatible with standard CCM workflows, offering researchers and clinicians a robust and efficient tool for DPN diagnosis. Further, multicentre studies are needed to validate these findings in diverse populations.

Indexed as

confocal microscopyDeep learningdiabetic neuropathy

Identifiers

PMID40103638
PMCPMC11915551

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.