ArticleDigital health
A double-edged sword?: Digitalization, health disparities, and the paradoxical case of e-pharmacy in Ghana.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Telepharmacy in Nigeria: a narrative review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Exploring documentation and reporting practices in malaria tracking: a mixed-methods study among formal drug retail shops in Hohoe Municipal, Ghana.Malaria journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: With the ongoing push for greater digitalization of healthcare in low- and middle- income countries (LMICs), the larger questions around who will benefit most from such efforts and what elements of disparities and inequities may further be created or reinforced are often overlooked. This study was undertaken to assess a pioneering e-pharmacy initiative in Ghana that aimed to explore issues of access and disparities in relation to pharmaceutical services. Method: The study used a qualitative research design where semi-structured interviews were conducted virtually with 21 licensed community pharmacists recruited through purposive and snowball sampling techniques. The data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis approach. Results: Pharmacists recognized the transformative potential of e-pharmacies, particularly in resource constrained regions that face issues of pharmacy and healthcare deserts. However, drawing on their experiential knowledge, they highlighted the paradoxes and challenges of promoting digitalization of healthcare in a country characterized by poor infrastructure, poverty, and multiple intersecting layers of inequities, as well as digital divides and low digital/health literacy. In the absence of adequate infrastructure, funding support and regulation, the possibility of local pharmacies, often the first point of care, being replaced by big corporations was feared. Participants also cautioned to steer the discourse of e-pharmacy away from access, pricing, and convenience to safety and quality. Conclusion: Digitalization of healthcare and e-pharmacies holds tremendous potential in the LMICs. However, such technological initiatives, if implemented without proper groundwork and adequate support, would run the risk of creating and exacerbating health disparities, especially in sub-Saharan Africa. A bottom-up approach, through grassroot engagement and implementation science, tethered to building safe, affordable, and equitable infrastructure and access to care will be essential for the success of e-pharmacy and other digitalization initiatives in the region and beyond. This research has direct implications for public health, policy, and pharmaceutical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.