ReviewAtherosclerosis plus2025
HDL-replacement therapy: From traditional to emerging clinical applications.
Review in Atherosclerosis plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cholesterol in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a bystander, a biomarker, or a target?Atherosclerosis plus · 2026Review
- Artificial recombinant high-density protein nanocarriers for precision drug delivery.Chemical science · 2026Review
- Mechanisms of high-density lipoprotein in regulating blood-brain barrier function: insights and implications.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2025Review
- Dysfunctional high-density lipoprotein: an updated review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The unique and multifaceted properties of high-density lipoproteins (HDL)-ranging from cholesterol efflux to anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant, and immunomodulatory effects-have prompted their direct use, particularly in cardiovascular ischemic conditions. Recent advances have extended the interest in HDL-based treatments to novel applications, from improving stent biocompatibility, to treatment of heart failure to central nervous system (CNS) disorders. Strategies to harness HDL's therapeutic potential have evolved from the direct use of isolated HDL in animal models to reconstituted HDL (rHDL) in humans. For these latter, the use of isolated apoA-I associated with different phospholipids has been the most frequent approach, also involving apparently beneficial mutants, such as the apo A-I Milano (AIM). From the initial very promising results, particularly with this mutant in coronary patients, later studies have mostly been non-confirmatory, although issues such as possible inadequate dose/response and unexpected immunological properties have come to light. Most recently a study on isolated plasma HDL in coronary patients (AEGIS-II) provided overall negative findings, but a clear fall of major cardiovascular events was recorded when restricting analysis to hypercholesterolemic patients. Emerging approaches, including gene therapy and plant-derived recombinant HDL formulations, hold promise for enhancing the accessibility and efficacy of HDL-based interventions. At this time, an improved approach to heart failure treatment also appears feasible, and a better understanding of the role played by HDL in the CNS may lead to significant improvements in the handling of some dramatic diseases at this level. While challenges persist, the evolving landscape of HDL replacement therapies offers hope for significant progress in addressing both cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.