ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Prediction model for psychological disorders in ankylosing spondylitis patients based on multi-label classification.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhancing action recognition in educational settings using AI-driven information systems for public health monitoring.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to develop a predictive model to assess the likelihood of psychological disorders in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and to explore the relationships between different factors and psychological disorders. Methods: Patients were randomly divided into training and test sets in an 8:2 ratio. The Boruta algorithm was applied to select predictive factors, and a multi-label classification learning algorithm based on association rules (AR) was developed. Models were constructed using Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), RF-AR, and KNN-AR, and their performance was assessed through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves on the test set. Results: A total of 513 AS patients were included, with 410 in the training set and 103 in the test set. The Boruta algorithm identified five key variables for the model: fatigue, ASAS-HI score, disease duration, disease activity, and BMI. The RF-AR model performed best, with an accuracy of 0.89 ± 0.06, recall of 0.78 ± 0.1, F1-score of 0.86 ± 0.08, Hamming loss of 0.05 ± 0.03, and a Jaccard similarity coefficient of 0.75 ± 0.12. The area under the curve (AUC) for the training set was 0.94. Conclusion: This study developed a predictive model for assessing the risk of psychological disorders in AS patients. The model effectively captures the presence of psychological disorders, providing clinicians with valuable insights for adjusting treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.