ReviewCureus2025
Ethical and Practical Considerations of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Medicine: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Mental Health: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice, Educational Transformation, and Ethical Governance.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Emerging Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Care.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in paediatric chest imaging: applications, challenges, and future directions.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- AI integration in pediatric radiology: perspectives from international academic leaders.European radiology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Weight Management in Children: A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Transforming Pediatric Care Through AI: Bridging the Digital Divide in Health Informatics.Online journal of public health informatics · 2026Article
- Large language models and child mortality: opportunities and challenges in answering public queries on under-5 causes.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Research on intellectual property rights and legal liability definition of artificial intelligence-assisted pediatric disease diagnosis system.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Transforming neonatal care through informatics: A review of artificial intelligence, data, and implementation considerations.Seminars in perinatology · 2025Review
- Pediatrics 4.0: the Transformative Impacts of the Latest Industrial Revolution on Pediatrics.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2025Article
- Conversational AI in Pediatric Mental Health: A Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Ethical considerations and challenges in the use of artificial intelligence in pediatric surgical practice: a national survey of Nigerian pediatric surgeons.World journal of pediatric surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming various industries, including pediatric medicine, raising both ethical and practical considerations in its implementation. AI is also being utilized more and more in pediatric care across a number of subspecialties. However, a number of major challenges still stand in the way of the practical implementation of AI. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the ethical and practical consideration of AI in the field of pediatric medicine. We searched five different databases (Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and IEEE Xplore) for relevant studies to include in this review. On these databases, we found 524 studies, which were retrieved to EndNote X6.0.1 software, where 207 were removed as duplicates, and the rest were assessed for eligibility with exclusion and inclusion criteria. Twenty studies were found eligible and were included in the study. In pediatric medicine, artificial intelligence (AI) is causing disruption and is now linked to opportunities, problems, and a demand for explainability. AI shouldn't be seen as a replacement for human judgment and experience but rather as a tool to improve and support healthcare decision-making. Therefore, in order to guarantee that research findings are generalizable, future studies should concentrate on gathering complete data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.