ReviewCureus2025
Dumping Syndrome and Bile Acid Reflux Following Pyloroplasty and Gastric Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (G-POEM) for Refractory Gastroparesis: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Efficacy of Combined Gastric Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy and Transpyloric Stenting: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.ACG case reports journal · 2026Article
- Mastering the third space: Innovations in intramural endoscopic surgery for gastrointestinal disorders.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Review
- Endoscopic Pyloric Exclusion for Treatment of Severe Refractory Bile Reflux.ACG case reports journal · 2025Article
- Endoscopic treatment modalities for the management of gastroparesis: a critical review.Annals of gastroenterologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatment options for medication- and diet-resistant gastroparesis include drainage procedures such as pyloroplasty and gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM). While dumping syndrome (DS) and bile acid gastritis (BAG) have been documented as complications following pyloric drainage procedures, limited evidence exists concerning their incidence after pyloroplasty and G-POEM for refractory gastroparesis. We performed a systematic review of outcomes following pyloroplasty and G-POEM for refractory gastroparesis (PROSPERO: CRD42024559654). PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for articles reporting rates of DS and BAG following pyloric drainage procedures. Assessed outcomes included rates of DS and BAG. Results were narratively synthesized and presented descriptively. Of the 2278 records reviewed, 10 studies were included. Six studies evaluated pyloroplasty, and four studies evaluated G-POEM. Nine studies reported incidence of DS, and two studies reported rates of BAG. The incidence of DS ranged from 0% to 23.1%, with a median incidence of 3.23% and an interquartile range of 6.95% among nine studies. The incidence of BAG ranged from 0% to 15.4% in two studies. The studies displayed high heterogeneity in study design, patient population, and co-interventions, precluding collective data analysis and limiting generalizability. All studies displayed a moderate to serious risk of bias. There exists a paucity of data regarding the incidence of DS and BAG following pyloroplasty and G-POEM for refractory gastroparesis. Despite the theoretical association of these complications with pylorus-modifying procedures, our findings suggest that they may be uncommon or underreported in the treatment of refractory gastroparesis. Improved reporting of these outcomes and robust prospective studies investigating the incidence of such complications are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.