ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
A comparative study of multiple physical assessment indicators to identify psychological symptoms: a cross-sectional study based on Chinese adolescents.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption, waist-to-height ratio and psychological symptoms among Chinese adolescents.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The association between sugar-sweetened beverage consumption, muscle strength, and psychological symptoms among Chinese adolescents: a multicenter cross-sectional survey.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) have long been important physical assessment indicators. In recent years a body shape index (ABSI) and body roundness index (BRI) have gained importance as new physical assessment indicators. However, it is unclear how these physical assessment indicators assess psychological symptoms in adolescents. The main purpose of this study was to determine the ability of BMI, WC, WHtR, ABSI, and BRI indicators to recognize psychological symptoms in Chinese adolescents and to examine whether ABSI and BRI are superior to the traditional BMI, WC, and WHtR. Methods: In this study, 42,472 (boys, 21,026, 49.5%) adolescents aged 12-18 years from six geographic regions in China were assessed for multiple physical assessment indicators (BMI, WC, WHtR, ABSI, BRI) and psychological symptoms from 2015 to 2016. One-way analysis of variance, Spearman's rank test, multifactor logistic regression analysis, and ROC analysis were used to analyze the validity of multiple physical assessment indicators to identify psychological symptoms. Results: The prevalence of psychological symptoms among Chinese adolescents aged 12-18 years was 26.17%. The BMI, WC, WHtR, ABSI, and BRI of the adolescents were (20.19 ± 3.43) kg/m2, (69.68 ± 10.05) cm, (0.42 ± 0.06), (0.06 ± 0.01), and (2.05 ± 0.92), respectively. The results of Spearman's rank test showed a positive correlation ( Conclusion: This study found that neither the ABSI nor the BRI was superior to BMI, WC, or WHtR in predicting psychological symptoms in Chinese adolescents. The ABSI was the least predictive of psychological symptoms in Chinese adolescents, whereas the BRI showed potential as a surrogate for WC and WHtR indicators for assessing psychological symptoms. This study provides additional help and suggestions for better identification of psychological symptoms in Chinese adolescents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.