Trial reportJournal of pain research2025
Safety and Effectiveness of Electroacupuncture During Colon Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Endoscopic treatment of early colon neoplasms has evolved as a valid and less traumatic alternative to surgical resection. It can usually be performed with sedation on an outpatient basis. The present study was performed to determine the safety and effectiveness of electroacupuncture (EA) versus propofol sedation during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early colon neoplasm. Methods: A total of 150 adult outpatients undergoing ESD were selected and divided into the EA combined with propofol group (EP group), remifentanil combined with propofol group (RP group), and propofol group (SP group), with 50 patients in each group. All patients received standard sedation with propofol. Acupuncture was performed before intravenous propofol injection in the EP group. A density wave of 1-3 mA, 2/100 hz current was administered for 20 min before the induction of anesthesia. The effectiveness of sedation was measured by satisfaction levels, and pain and sedation scores were measured by questionnaires. Respiratory and hemodynamic complications were monitored and compared as indices of safety. Results: Demographic data were comparable among the three groups. The total dose of propofol and the percentage of body movement in the EP group were lower than in the SP and RP groups ( Conclusion: Sedation with EA is effective and safe for patients undergoing ESD, and could improve the satisfaction levels of patients and gastroendoscopists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.