ArticleBioscience reports2025
Development and validation of an epigenetic signature of allostatic load.
Article in Bioscience reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The allostatic load (AL) concept measures physiological dysregulation in response to internal and external stressors that accumulate across the life course. AL has been consistently linked to chronic disease risk across studies. However, there is considerable variation in its operationalization. In the present study, DNA methylation (DNAm) data (using the Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip array) from the Swiss Kidney Project on Genes in Hypertension (SKIPOGH) cohort, a Swiss-based family cohort study, were used in a discovery epigenome-wide association study to identify cytosine-guanine nucleotide sites associated with phenotypic measures of AL. Elastic net linear regression models were used to estimate an epigenetic signature of AL (methAL), including an Illumina HumanMethylation450K (HM450K) assay-compatible signature (methALT). The methALT signature was validated in the 1936 Lothian Birth Cohort (LBC1936), population-based prospective cohort study. We found that the methAL signature was positively associated with the clinical phenotype of AL in both the SKIPOGH (R2 = 0.59) and LBC1936 (R2 = 0.16) cohorts. In the validation cohort, a one standard deviation increase in methALT signature was associated with 25% higher odds of reported history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) (odd ratio [OR] = 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05-1.50), and a nearly two-fold increase in all-cause mortality rate at the beginning of follow-up (hazard ratio = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.33-2.13) when adjusting for all potential confounders. In conclusion, the epigenetic signature for AL not only correlated well with phenotype-based AL scores but also exhibited a stronger association with the history of CVD and all-cause mortality compared with AL scores. The methAL signature could help assuage issues of comparison across studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.