Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40105069›Full record

ArticleZhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics2025

[Expert consensus on parenteral nutrition management in neonates (2025)].

Nutritional Committee of Neonatology Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association; Preterm Committee of Neonatology Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association; Editorial Committee of Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics

Abstract readEnglish AbstractConsensus Statement
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. [Interpretation of the "Expert consensus on the management of neonatal parenteral nutrition (2025)"].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nutritional Committee of Neonatology Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association; Preterm Committee of Neonatology Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association; Editorial Committee of Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parenteral nutrition (PN) is widely utilized in the field of neonatology and is a critical life-saving intervention for critically ill neonates or preterm infants who cannot meet their energy and nutrient needs through enteral feeding. To further standardize and optimize the clinical management of PN, this consensus was developed by a working group based on relevant research progress both domestically and internationally. Employing the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation, the consensus presents 24 recommendations covering seven aspects of PN: indications, administration routes, energy, fluid volume, composition of nutritional solutions, timing of cessation, and monitoring. The aim is to provide guidance for relevant practitioners in PN management to improve the short-term and long-term outcomes for neonates.

Indexed as

Parenteral NutritionConsensusHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureAmino acidExpert consensusLipid emulsionNutrientParenteral nutritionPreterm infant

Identifiers

PMID40105069
PMCPMC11928041

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.