ArticleEuropean journal of clinical investigation2025
Impact of sirolimus on long-term adverse cardiovascular outcomes in kidney transplant recipients: A nationwide cohort study.
Article in European journal of clinical investigation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neutral impact of mTOR inhibitors on cardiovascular outcomes after kidney transplantation.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Article
- Impact of sirolimus on long-term adverse cardiovascular outcomes in kidney transplant recipients: A nationwide cohort study.European journal of clinical investigation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundKidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are at high risk for cardiovascular disease due to the long-term use of immunosuppressive therapy. This study aims to evaluate the long-term impact of sirolimus on cardiovascular outcomes in Korean KTRs.
methodsFrom a cohort of 7180 eligible KTRs identified from 2010 to 2021, 387 KTRs who received sirolimus were included. To control for confounding variables, propensity score matching was applied, and the landmark method was used to address immortal time bias. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, ischaemic stroke and all-cause mortality.
resultsThe analysis showed no significant difference in MACE between the sirolimus-treated and untreated groups (hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% confidence interval, .77-2.55), despite a higher incidence of dyslipidaemia in the sirolimus-treated group. However, subgroup analysis revealed an increased MACE risk in KTRs with pre-transplant congestive heart failure (CHF) who were treated with sirolimus (hazard ratio, 6.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.78-21.74), while no significant differences were found in other subgroups.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that while sirolimus can be a viable option for immunosuppression, it should be used cautiously in those with pre-existing CHF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.