ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2025
Impact of the Underutilization of Vibration-Controlled Transient Elastography in MASLD Patients Without Insurance Coverage.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeVibration-controlled transient elastographies (VCTEs) are used to surveil disease progression in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), but this test is not covered by Florida Medicaid. This study aims to quantify the number of MASLD adults in a tertiary care center who did not obtain VCTEs despite indications for one based on their fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) scores, estimate the downstream costs associated with lack of VCTE access, and extrapolate these findings to the broader Florida Medicaid population.
methodsThe study population was categorized into fibrosis risk groups based on their FIB-4 scores. For each insurance group (Medicaid, Medicare, and private), elastography studies and costs were collected and compared in patients who did or did not receive them. This data were then extrapolated to the statewide Medicaid MASLD population.
resultsAmong 282 MASLD patients with Medicaid, 64 patients were categorized as "intermediate-risk" for fibrosis based on their FIB-4, but only 4 had VCTEs performed. The number of VCTEs performed was significantly lower in the Medicaid group in comparison to all "intermediate-risk" patients with Medicaid, Medicare, and private insurance [χ
conclusionVCTEs are underutilized in MASLD patients with Medicaid and VCTE use is associated with significantly lower downstream healthcare costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.