Evidence mapPaperPMID 40106397Full record

Trial reportHealth technology assessment (Winchester, England)2025

Benefits of aldosterone receptor antagonism in chronic kidney disease: the BARACK-D RCT.

F D Richard Hobbs, Richard McManus, Clare Taylor, Nicholas Jones, Joy Rahman, Jane Wolstenholme, Louise Jones, Jennifer Hirst, Sam Mort, Ly-Mee Yu and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

F D Richard HobbsNuffield Department of Primary Health Care Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7976-7172
Richard McManusNuffield Department of Primary Health Care Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3638-028X
Clare TaylorNuffield Department of Primary Health Care Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8926-2581
Nicholas JonesNuffield Department of Primary Health Care Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0352-3785
Joy RahmanNuffield Department of Primary Health Care Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0009-0000-0512-5062
Jane WolstenholmeNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7493-1850
Louise JonesNuffield Department of Primary Health Care Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0519-2334
Jennifer HirstNuffield Department of Primary Health Care Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8416-2159
Sam MortNuffield Department of Primary Health Care Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6332-4641
Ly-Mee YuNuffield Department of Primary Health Care Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0331-7364
BARACK-D Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chronic kidney disease affects around 10% of the global population and is associated with significant risk of progression to end-stage renal disease and vascular events. Aldosterone receptor antagonists such as spironolactone have shown prognostic benefits in patients with heart failure, but effects on patients with chronic kidney disease are uncertain. Objectives: To determine the effect of low-dose spironolactone on mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in people with chronic kidney disease stage 3b. Design: Prospective randomised open blinded end-point trial. Settings: Three hundred and twenty-nine general practitioner practices throughout the United Kingdom. Participants: Patients meeting the criteria for chronic kidney disease stage 3b (estimated glomerular filtration rate 30-44 ml/minute/1.73 m Intervention: Participants were randomised 1 : 1 to receive either spironolactone 25 mg once daily in addition to standard care, or standard care only. Outcome measures: Primary outcome was the first occurring of all-cause mortality, first hospitalisation for heart disease (coronary heart disease, arrhythmia, atrial fibrillation, sudden death, failed sudden death), stroke, heart failure, transient ischaemic attack or peripheral arterial disease, or first occurrence of any condition not listed at baseline. Secondary outcome measures included changes in blood pressure, renal function, B-type natriuretic peptide, incidence of hyperkalaemia and treatment costs and benefits. Results: One thousand four hundred and thirty-four participants were randomised of the 3022 planned. We found no evidence of differences between the intervention and control groups in terms of effectiveness with the primary combined vascular end points, nor with the secondary clinical outcomes, including progression in renal decline. These results were similar for the total treatment periods or a 3-year follow-up period as originally planned. More adverse events were experienced and more participants discontinued treatment in the intervention group. Two-thirds of participants randomised to spironolactone stopped treatment within six months because they met pre-specified safety stop criteria. The addition of low-dose spironolactone was estimated to have a cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained value above the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence's threshold of £30,000. Limitations: Main limitations were difficulties in recruiting eligible participants resulting in an underpowered trial with poor ethnic diversity taking twice as long as planned to complete. We have explored the data in secondary analyses that indicate that, despite these difficulties, the findings were reliable. Conclusions: The benefits of aldosterone receptor antagonism in chronic kidney disease trial found no evidence to support adding low-dose spironolactone (25 mg daily) in patients with chronic kidney disease stage 3b: there were no changes to cardiovascular events during the trial follow-up, either for the combined primary or individual components. There was also no evidence of benefit observed in rates of renal function decline over the trial, but much higher initial creatinine rise and estimated glomerular filtration rate decline, and to a higher percentage rate, in the intervention arm in the first few weeks of spironolactone treatment, which resulted in a high proportion of participants discontinuing spironolactone treatment at an early stage. These higher rates of negative renal change reduced in scale over the study but did not equalise between arms. The addition of 25 mg of spironolactone therefore provided no reno- or cardio-protection and was associated with an increase in adverse events. Future work: These findings might not be applicable to different mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. Study registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN44522369. Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 12/01/52) and is published in full in

Indexed as

Mineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsRenal Insufficiency, ChronicSpironolactoneAgedCardiovascular DiseasesCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesQuality-Adjusted Life YearsUnited KingdomMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsSpironolactoneCARDIOVASCULAR RISKCHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASECKDCLINICAL TRIALMODERATE CKD, CKDPREVENTIONSPIRONOLACTONETREATMENT

Identifiers

PMID40106397
PMCPMC11931407

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.